Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Conversations: Episode 18 w/ pdballiet - Eros and Agape in a Self-Loving Cosmos (part 2-2)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
532 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 13, 2009

part 2 with phil.

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 4 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (16)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @vriver707 What?

  • @theprodigy2186 i think hes a fag. oh yeah, a freak too.

  • I would literally PAY good money to have Phil make more videos.

    I true modern philosopher. Why has he stopped?

  • was that all that was in the interview? it seems like there should have been more.

  • The same goes for time. There is a sense in which all past and all future are present "now," there is another very real sense in which there is a difference between the past and future. Similarly again, even if people exist intersubjectively, a theory cannot make it impossible to account for the fact that they are still not all the same person. I highly recommend Heidegger's Being and Time and Sartre's Being and Nothingness for discussions of time, object-ness, and intersubjectivity.

    --Chris

  • The idealist response was to posit that the subject and the object are actually the same thing, using Spinoza as an inspiration, who eliminated the mind-body problem in a similar way (note that Spinoza did not solve as much as dissolve the problem). The problem, though, is how do you account for the fact that objects are different from the subject in a very real way. Representations are imposed on the subject whether it wants them or not.

  • Your comment about there being an identity is somewhat similar to Hegel, but I want to point out a few possible problem areas. German idealism grew out of the failure of Kantianism to account for the relationship between the transcendental ego and the noumenal world. Critics very quickly realized that saying that noumena "cause" phenomena is a misappplication of the category of causality, which can only be applied to phenomena.

  • Mumbjo jumbo.

  • this is better with sound down ;]

  • Sorry but it sounds like he's spewing a bunch of nonsensical bullshit. How many times can you redefine the word love in 10 minutes?

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more