Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Part 11 Q&A: Hugh Ross, Fuz Rana, and Michael Shermer - Was Darwin Wrong? Debate at UT 4/28/9

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,428
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 30, 2009

Sorry this ended early, my camcorder ran out of memory...

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (13)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • At 2:06 The man with glasses has it so wrong. It was Darwinian theory that predicted man being a more genetically complex creature, & that is why scientist were surprised to find that we had only 20-30 thousand genes (depending on who you ask) while the lowly amoeba can have more genetic information & by orders of magnitude. Its called Cvalue Enigma & it showed that an organism complexity cannot be determined genetically, which is a blow to the Darwinian paradigm of simple to complex life.

  • @Apologist117 Subtle down Apologeist!

  • Oh no! Is this it? Has anybody got the last parts?

  • Seriously. Post the rest of this. I'm coming from the RTB perspective, I've seen plenty of these debates, but regardless, it's a joke and I feel like I just wasted an hour of my time watching all of these not to see the end. Clearly Shermer is a rant artist and a king of ad homonym arguments, but at least I'd like to hear what he has to say. Go find the rest of the video and upload it even if (like I suspect) is more topic avoidance, side stories, and garbage.

  • If you don't have the full debate, remove this presentation.

  • as long as its not gay buffalo BS.

  • That was about 100 times more interesting than the television news..

  • Thanks for posting.

  • Unfortunately, Michael Shermer blew it by going into a ranting diatribe, rather than responding on a scientific level to RTB's "testable model". So in reality no debate took place, which was a shame.

  • I would very much like to see the rest of this.  Unlike the previous poster, I have no interest in seeing anyone get destroyed. I just want to weight the merits of each sides argument. That's only fair. I must say, however, that I don't think Shermer's arrogant posturing and toxic disrespect is helpful in drilling down to the real issues. He is a clever wordsmith, and obviously extremely intelligent. Of course, his behavior is typical of the new atheists.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more