Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Name an accomplishment by Obama, part II

Hannity & Colmes.  
 
Customize

More From: pundital

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
355 ratings
Sign in to rate
117,458 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (1)

Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (1,079)   Options

Loading...
ofcccaddy2004 (8 hours ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
of course race comes up
mrtarzan227 (1 week ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
He can't accomplish anything cause the man's keepin him down !!!!!!!!!!!! lol
blah11blah (1 week ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
It is an accomplishment, but not a legislative accomplishment.
SHAMSHAM1090 (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Hilary should have been the demcratic canidate
imfeelngood (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
I did a little campaigning against Obama and I have testimony of his supporters, 100% of all I talked to, attesting on his behalf because of his race. NOT ACCOMPLISHMENTS! We have pledged now for decades one man shouldn't have preference over another because of his race and here we go again... the shoes on the other foot. However, it's still racism. I feel we can now appreciate President Bush's spending of 8 years compared to less than ONE YEAR of President Obama
paulgoodsalt (1 month ago) Show Hide
 -4
Marked as spam
The obstacles faced for a visual minority to get into a white circles of great power, yes a huge accomplishment.

I think the missed point here is that his accomplishments of political change are skewed. Race should not be factored.

He had me convinced that he meant change, I've seen a whole lot of effort and a whole lot of opposition. At this point it's all too early to judge. And those that do it is fair to say, they didn't vote for, or support Obama in the first place.
Alaska47Boy (2 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
I'm sticking with the original points because you haven't effectively refutted any of them. I'll change the tune when you can bring somesalient discussion points besides "No! they can name something!" or, "I think I'm a chemist!" Too funny.
Alaska47Boy (2 months ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
Um- nice rebuttal? You DO know that your argument doesn't become more right the more names you call someone, right? No- probably not. They don't teach that on MTV or BET.
Alaska47Boy (2 months ago) Show Hide
+2
Marked as spam
Listen to this. Thier sample of Obama supporters from every age, race, and gender produced not one person who could name something. If you went out asking, the same results would happen. Statistically, at least one person should have been able to name one thing. They couldn't. And for good reason. Drop he Bush thing- you're digging a hole for yourself, and you obviously can't back it up. You can't prove Bush smoked crack. Get over it, along with the inability to name an accomplishment.
lilpolo20 (2 months ago)
Comment removed by author

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.