Uploaded by AnInviteToTheTruth on Aug 7, 2009
Communism is Evil. Heres Why.
Nowadays, we dont have a healthy fear of evil philosophies. We believe that we can all just get along, and accept our differences. No, its okay to have one person believe one thing and another person believe the opposite, and they can live together peacefully.
Unfortunately, the same people that believe this wondered why it was necessary for Reagan to build Star Wars, why Reagan shouted, Tear down this wall! and why Bush is kicking terrorist butt in the sands of Iraq and Afghanistan. After all, these are kind and sensitive people who are only looking out for the poor and weak, right?
What you dont know or believe in can kill you. Just because you dont believe a snake is poisonous doesnt mean a snake bite wont send you to an early grave. Just because you dont believe cancer is a deadly disease doesnt mean you wont die from it.
The same is true for philosophies. Communism, the philosophy, is a poison, a poison that will kill Americans as fast as it has killed millions of people across the world.
Let me spell it out for you in plain English: There are evil men out there, and there are a lot of them. Hitler was one of many. The world is filled with these men. Some are not as extreme as others, but the extreme ones have a certain bloodlust for power, and are willing to kill their own mothers, children, and wives to get it.
Read your history. Study what power does to people. Study about the kind of people drawn to power. Study how the get power, how they keep it, and how they use it. You will come to one conclusion: Your mindset of tolerance and compassion isnt shared by everyone. And when push comes to shove, those people will try to use it against you.
Take the communist movement. A young idealist, Karl Marx, is simply trying to think about all the poor people around the world, and trying to come up with a fair way to help them be free from economic slavery. Sounds noble and good, right? And it is. This is something everyone should work for, starting with themselves, and then their families, and then their communities.
What wasnt good was Karl Marxs plan to make everyone equal by government rule. Rather than build up, he wanted to tear down. Rather than quicken, he wanted to kill. He saw obstacles to his wonderful utopic recipe everywhere he turned. His conclusion, and the conclusions of everyone who tries to follow his path, is that everyone else, every other organization, must be destroyed. The ones that must be destroyed first are those that do the most good. In the ashes, society can be rebuilt in the just and true way.
Communism, as Reagan carefully explained, is not a new idea. It is a very old idea, dressed up in modern clothes and freshened up with modern language. It is the same idea that the Egyptians had when they enslaved the Jews. It is the same idea that the Assyrians, Babylonians, Persians, Greeks, Romans, and Mongols had as they sent out murdering armies to torture the earth and enslave free people. It is the same idea as the people who bought and sold men. It is simply mans quest to conquer everyone else and make themselves king or emperor. They want to eat the food made by others for free, and they will say and do anything to get it.
Under communism, a select group of elites control every aspect of life. They control who gets to grow food, who gets to eat that food, and who gets to starve. Interestingly, it is the people who grow the food who starve. They control what people are allowed to think, say, and do. They control every aspect of society. Or so they wish to do so.
As my friend who actually lived under Communist Russia explained, early into the revolution, it was realized that communism was much more dangerous than any anti-communist had thought. It was a dangerous thing, dangerous not just to the people but to those high up in the power chain. And so the government began to relax the very controls that communism prescribed. That is, Russia only boasted that they were communist, but what kept them alive was the black markets, black markets that moved food, medical supplies, and expertise around the country without any government intervention. And the government did little to stop the black markets, acknowledging, privately, that those markets kept the people alive.
-
0 likes, 5 dislikes
Link to this comment:
10:00The bloody History of Communism - Results of Ch...by AnInviteToTheTruth493 views
10:00The bloody History of Communism - Results of Ch...by AnInviteToTheTruth253 views
15:13Warum die meisten Menschen ungläubig sind - Die...by AnInviteToTheTruth141 views
10:00The bloody History of Communism - Results of Ch...by AnInviteToTheTruth265 views
13:38Sinn des Lebens - Der islamische Weg zur Überze...by AnInviteToTheTruth204 views
10:36Dean torturing Alastair (or is it the other way...by avarielle69,622 views
10:00The bloody History of Communism - Results of Ch...by AnInviteToTheTruth511 views
10:00The bloody History of Communism - Results of Ch...by AnInviteToTheTruth704 views
9:52Socialism is stealing: Isn't Obama's Socialism ...by christianroots459 views
5:20WHY COMMUNISM DOES NOT WORK.by ms2true1005,373 views
3:57Political Systems Explained for Dummiesby turnbeutelvergesserB97,214 views
7:08Equal Money for All from Birth to Deathby BellaBargilly1,046 views
5:17Assyrians from Moscow dancing Sheykhane 2008_08_28by jungluk31,009 views
8:40The bloody History of Communism - Results of Ch...by AnInviteToTheTruth483 views
4:57Communism and Socialism Explainedby jediknight368,626 views
- Loading more suggestions...
If Darwinism justifies any political theory it justifies the free market and the natural selection of the most successful businesses - it provides no justification of communism. Communist is extinct because it failed to evolve.
EqualAndFree 11 months ago
The way of communism! The Poor is saved! FUCK THE RICH!
ALL ABOUT COMMUNISM!!!! Stalin made god here "P
helloknoob 1 year ago
Talking about repuplican anti-communist propaganda
Festabenkaj 1 year ago
"(Darwin's) ideas have been appropriated by many different ideologies and personalities (sic) yet most of these commentaries were developed with very little understanding of Darwin's actual views, whether political or scientific." - "Evolution & Ecology of the Organism" (Rose & Mueller, 2006)
karlkarlkarl1234 1 year ago