Fox News airs altered photos of New York Times reporters

Fox News, with no disclaimer, aired altered photos of New York Times reporters Steven Reddicliffe and Jacques Steinberg. Another example of Fox News' blatant, outrageous propaganda.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• fox
• news
• watch
• stupid
• altered
• photo
• manipulation
• shopped
• insane
• new
• york
• times
• propaganda
• Jacques
• Steinberg

[GaryG1111]

this is Fox News people,, not the enquirer

[mateyboy07]

Good one, now tell that to the millions of people who use Fox as their main source of news, and who form their opinions and ultimately choose who they vote for based on what they hear on Fox News.

[TurboSpaghettiRobot]

The crappy photoshop at the end is disgusting. That's not news at all. Fucking cunts, all of them.

[turnerjazz]

So you have no problem with fox news twisting or blatantly altering the news so long as it makes liberals mad? The GOP is calling, they don't want you.

[Blankchilde88]

Pretty bad photoshop work. I hate foxnews, they disseminate conservative propaganda. There's probably news stations in China that are less biased.

[xadam2dudex]

FOX LIES FOX LIES FOX LIES FOX LIES what else is there to say ?

[astreve]

@lozoft9 you can't take a good joke.

[lozoft9]

@astreve News channels aren't supposed to joke. This isn't South Park. This isn't Looney Tunes. The commentators on a news channel are supposed to not sensationalize the news. Any journalism student or professor will tell you that. Fox News should not have comedians on their network. Otherwise, they should call it just "Fox"; no "News". And this is coming from an active libertarian.

[astreve]

liberals can't take a good joke.

[ezalburez]

Are you kidding? You liberals should be comedians!

[goodlad22]

REDICLIFFE HAS A HEAD LIKE A BURST COUCH

[PurpleStorm8]

Yikes!

[Ambulanceo]

Wow, I didn't know photoshoppers of the lowest common denominator could get a job at Fox News!

[TheJoeyzxc]

And yet, Fox News is #1.

Even though the only reason it began was so billionaire Rupert Murdoch could make more money than CNN.

In 1996, they started.

Then they wanted more ratings. They added opinion-based programming and biased news reporters.