WTC 7 reported collapsed too soon by BBC News 24

A second example of the BBC news on 9/11 utilising an advanced report of WTC 7 having collapsed prior to the actual event. Indicating someone who supplied the information perhaps had foreknowledge.

This is strengthened in the BBC World coverage of Jane Standleys live feed, where even an official reason for the collapse is detailed some 20 minutes prior to the event. Whilst WTC 7 is still on the skyline behind her!! Classic.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• 9/11
• wtc7
• BBC
• Foreknowledge
• terrorism
• news
• politics
• bush
• lies

[RugtimXII]

I just want to say that in September, the time zone used in New York is EDT, or GMT-4, which means, that when this was broadcast in the United Kingdom at 21:54, the local time in New York was 17:54. I'm not saying that Bush didn't knock down the towers or that Jane Standley wasn't "standling" in front of the WTC7. I'm just saying that at the time of this broadcast it was 5:54 PM in New York.

[Reflecter]

@RugtimXII...As that shits even confused me. ..

What you are suggesting now is instead of pre-cognition, we have post voyeuristic intentions, as WTC7 fell completely at 5:21:10 NYT and began at 5:20:33. Meaning Jane is 'standling' before a blue screen window of a pre NY skyline, saying a building (hasn't yet) behind her collapsed but will (already has) by means known only to future 2003-8 reports as to flimsy reasons why?

I only keep the damn video up here for histories sake! So pls reply.

[JoCa555]

They can remove it from Google/Youtube, but there are so much people like me, who downloaded the videos on harddisk and will upload it, even daily when necessarily.

[CheesynessOnAStick]

daylight saving time was here in september. but that puts us ahead one hour, increasing the time difference.

[bigderekkeene]

@w1lf1ewoo yeah, again well done on not reading a single thing i have written down you'll see in my comments ive made no leaping or splashing in my comments merely pointed out the fact that this reporter managed to report on a total building collapse which hadnt even happened and then did happen twenty minutes later.I have merely pointed out this astounding piece of forsight, to those idiots who try and dismiss this occurance with ridicule, in short brain dead tits like you!!!

[w1lf1ewoo]

@bigderekkeene There are things that dont clearly fit- but YOU OFFER NO SOUND EXPLANATION- Just the same old LEAP LEAP SPLASH MENTALITY Why dont you go and bother the NASAmoon landings or princess diana, and the BBC?..thanks for conveniently not answering that..bcs even you know that is implausable that the staff of the BBC in London could be "in on your CONSPIRACY " anyway Im bored with you and this B.S. - feel free to reply and have the last word which Im sure you'll want/need.- yawn

[bigderekkeene]

@w1lf1ewoo Wrong, im not the man with all the answers, and nor have i claimed in any of my comments that i am, perhaps if you'd spent less time being a tit and more time reading my comments you'd have seen this, Why not do just 15 minutes research on why that building would have been considered for demolition and you might have your eyes slightly opened instead of just jumping on the bandwagon of ridicule. Perhaps you feel the 9/11 commission was an intelligent investigation?

[w1lf1ewoo]

@bigderekkeene Ha! All big accidents/incidents/crimes don't tightly fit together like a giant million piece jigsaw puzzle.what they require is intelligent investigation. You have an inner need to feel smart bcs you lack that reality. something doesnt add up at a glance- suddenley your the man with the answers right? ha!Way smarter than the masses of idiots around you..2 questions 4 U..why did the govt destroy WTC7 and tell the BBC? ;>

bigderekkeene 8 hours ago

bigderekkeene 8 hours ago

[bigderekkeene]

@w1lf1ewoo Yeah, your levels of sarcasm are extraordinary!! Superhuman in fact. You are true black belt, fifth dan of sarcasm, no doubt. However, your efforts in using ridicule are sad. It seems that most of the closed minded idiots, when faced with one of the many harrowing realities of this event generally opt for this tactic instead of facing up to its harsh reality. How does it make you feel that you were completely unable to come up with any kind of original, independant reply?

[w1lf1ewoo]

@bigderekkeene Actually you're so right! I know bcs I work for the gov't and we're here to control your mind. We thought it would be a really good idea to tell the BBC that we were about to dynamite WTC 7. (actually the BBC staff are all evil drones we've programmed to fool the close-minded idiots out there) didn't you know that?. You see It's my and my colleagues' job to help you build up a paranoid world of your own making- and then come for you!  How we doin Derek? ; )

[RugtimXII]

@Reflecter: I'm suggesting nothing but that when this report was broadcast, the time was 5:54 PM in New York, and that the BBC reported the collapse 33 minutes after it happened.