Fourth Annual Rosenkranz Debate: Constitutionality of Health Care Law 11-12-11
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Uploaded on Nov 14, 2011
The Fourth Annual Rosenkranz Debate was held on November 12, 2011, during The Federalist Society's 2011 National Lawyers Convention. The debate, titled "RESOLVED: Congress Acted Within Its Authority in Enacting the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act", featured Prof. Laurence H. Tribe of Harvard Law School and Hon. Paul D. Clement of Bancroft PLLC and former U.S. Solicitor General with Prof. Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz of the Georgetown Law Center as the moderator. Introduction by Mr. Eugene B. Meyer, President of the Federalist Society.
Fourth Annual Rosenkranz Debate and Luncheon
RESOLVED: Congress Acted Within Its Authority in Enacting the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
12:30 p.m. -- 2:30 p.m.
Grand Ballroom
--Hon. Paul D. Clement, Partner, Bancroft PLLC and former U.S. Solicitor General
--Prof. Laurence H. Tribe, Carl M. Loeb University Professor, Harvard Law School
--Moderator: Prof. Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz, Georgetown University Law Center
--Introduction: Mr. Eugene B. Meyer, President, The Federalist Society
Mayflower Hotel
Washington, DC
-
Category
-
License
Standard YouTube License
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
-
34:55
The Great Health Care Debateby Thom HartmannFeatured
5,090
-
1:24:29
Debating the Constitutionality of the Federal Health Care Legislation 11-18-10by Federalist Society Video
3,310 views
-
1:25:22
Obamacare in the Supreme Court 3-20-12by TheFederalistSociety
2,296 views
-
1:17:05
The Constitutionality of the Individual Mandate 1-7-11by TheFederalistSociety
4,265 views
-
1:04:52
Is the Affordable Care Act Constitutional? 2-22-12by TheFederalistSociety
1,553 views
-
45:33
Is the Obama Health Care Reform Constitutional?by HarvardLawSchool
11,639 views
-
15:01
Part 1 of 9 - Sam Harris vs William Lane Craig - Debate: Does Good Come From God - 7 April 2011by BoteachAfterlife
4,505 views
-
6:42
Paul Clement (2009) on Robert H. Jackson (part 1)by RobertHJacksonCenter
889 views
-
1:35:32
Is Health Care Reform Constitutional?by Amherst College
3,703 views
-
1:04:36
Laurence Tribe and Roger Pilon (10/2/11)by The Commonwealth Club of California
864 views
-
1:43:47
Conference on the Constitutional Convention: Legal Panelby Harvard Law School
1,955 views
-
2:12:20
Debate - William Lane Craig vs Christopher Hitchens - Does God Exist?by KYLYKaHYT
801,238 views
-
1:35:56
Antonin Scalia and Stephen Breyer, hosted by the Federalist and the American Constitution Societiesby TheNewsBuckit
8,418 views
-
10:40
Rachel Maddow Gingrich forestalls inevitable values hypocrisy questionby PresidentObama3's channel
910 views
-
1:21:42
Third Annual Rosenkranz Debate: The Constitutionality of Proposition 8 11-20-10by Federalist Society Video
879 views
-
1:02
Elena Kagan and Paul Clementby Teri O'Brien
1,405 views
-
1:06:27
2011 Annual Supreme Court Round Up 7-12-11by TheFederalistSociety
1,063 views
-
7:53
Paul Clement Discusses the Supreme Court's ObamaCare Rulingby catoinstitutevideo
1,160 views
-
1:20:27
Fifth Annual Rosenkranz Debate: Natural Law and Constitutional Law 11-17-12by TheFederalistSociety
3,887 views
-
7:28
Richard Posner: Constitutional Interpretationby Big Think
1,479 views
- Loading more suggestions...
All Comments (23)
LiveFreeorDieGuy 9 months ago
I love this debate. I found Paul Clement's argument more convincing but I also believe the government's case was convincing too. Such great intellectual debate. It certainly isn't an easy decision but I am glad these guys are making the arguments and not Occupy Wall Street or the Tea Party. God bless America and the smart rational people.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
ericfeinberg28 10 months ago
The government didn't invent mortality; its a fact of life. Clement keeps saying that it can be rational to not buy healthcare at certain times of life, but the problem is that person won't be the one paying for it if his gamble goes bad and he gets a brain tumor; the taxpayers have to cover the cost, not him. Therefore, the government isn't compelling anyone to dive into the river, we just all find ourselves in it by nature. If you think God is acting unconstitutionally, talk to your priest.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
ericfeinberg28 10 months ago
obama-tribe 2012
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
chas766 1 year ago
38:07 That is quite a large cockroach crawling up the curtain. I thought it was a small bug on my screen at first.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
muchachogenio 1 year ago
Everyone does NOT need health care, but everyone does DIE. So why is everyone not forced to have insurance to cover basic body disposal costs? If corn farmers are struggling economically and the government has deemed corn to be a commodity of national interest, why not force citizens to buy a portion of corn to increase demand? Where is the limit? As Clement said, there is no uniqueness principle in the constitution based on a rational basis. Strike it down as an affront to individual liberty.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
amusingmyslf . 1 year ago
I have one word for ObamaCare... "EXTORTION"
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
lrvarga 1 year ago
The Administrative Procedures Act, (1967 amendment) power grant to authority in agency discretion to commit authority to agency commitment in authority; effective fusion in overlap between the separate powers in branch, commitment to agency administration of unitary authority in process. Democracy bows to efficacy, the muse of corruption.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
coocookuhchoo 1 year ago
Who knew we had constitutional scholars here on Youtube
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube