Bibles; Textual Criticism: Is the Textus Receptus Older than Westcott & Hort Text? Yes

Textual Criticism #9004 TC4: Why the Textus Receptus (Byzantine) is older than Westcott & Hort Text (Alexandrian and Vaticannus ) The Ante Nicene Fathers (Polycarp, Tranacus, Etc.) Give an indelible stamp of Authority that Manuscripts of TR predate A&B 100-125 years.

by Jim Brown of Grace and Truth Ministries
http://www.graceandtruth.net/
------------------------------------------------------

Notes:

The Ante-Nicene Fathers, 10 vols. is before the RCC and before the text ( manuscripts ) become corrupt.

Volume Titles:
Volume 1: Apostolic Fathers, Justin Martyr, Inrenaeus
Volume 2: Hermas, Tatian, Athenagoras, Theophilus, Clement of Alexandria
Volume 3: Tertullian
Volume 4: Tertullian (IV), Minucius Felix, Commodian, Origen
Volume 5: Hippolytus, Cyprian, Caius, Novatian, Appendix
Volume 6: Gregory Thaumaturgus, Dionysius the Great, Julius Africanus, Anatolius and Minor Writers, Methodius, Arnobius

End of the 3rd century the first 6 books.

Tertullian was born 160 AD and died somewhere between (220-240) AD

Westcott and Hort Text was found in the 325+ AD. This means that Tertullian was before these perversion were found.

Can we prove that Mark 16:9-20 is actually in the scriptures? Yes we can because Tertullian references it!

Vol. 3 p.206

All these modern scholars that support anything other than the Textus Receptus are lairs, and sons the devil himself. They are all heretics.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Ante-Nicene Fathers
• Textus Receptus
• Byzantine
• Byzantine Text
• Jim Brown
• graceandtruth
• Grace and Truth Ministries
• Textual Criticism
• Westcott & Hort
• Westcott
• Hort
• Alexandrian
• Vaticannus
• The Ante Nicene Fathers
• Polycarp
• Tranacus
• Tertullian
• Mark 16:9-20

[carriebrk]

thank you for posting this. And thank Jim Brown for his research and presentation.