Zapruder Film Background
Uploader Comments (shitstinx)
Top Comments
-
Zapruder never actually "owned" the film because he was ordered to go shoot the footage and turn it over to his handlers. So in reality he wasn't shooting his own movie as he was hired to shoot footage. Any money he received was hush money. Then the movie was retouched and altered. TV Fakery then and TV Fakery now (911)
-
@abennett4Asshole Idiot. Manufacturers of rifles and ammunition do not make them sometimes slightly undersized. "Hey guys, lets make some ammo that is 1/4 inch shorter for Oswald, and let's stamp it 38 Auto instead of 38 SPC". LOL !!! You totally fucking IDIOT. LOL. There was only ballistics lies from co-conspirator Hoover.
Frazier lied. There was no curtain rods package. The shipping clerk, Jack Edwin Dougherty, said Oswald did not carry a package to work that morning.
All Comments (38)
-
@funkmasterjee the documented evidence is the WC FBI and Marina statements, as listed already for Dec 63 and Jan 64 in parenthesis.
-
@funkmasterjee hard evidence is always made hard to come by. Try Bertrand Russell, a famous writer of that era. It is called "16 questions on the assassination".
One of the eyewitnesses to the Tippit kill was shot in the head, but survived. Another Tippit victim was the brother of Benevides, who saw the killer and NEVER said it was Oswald. Not even on the youtube did he say "Oswald". When the authorities are the criminals, do you speak anyway and get yourself or family killed?
-
" illegal incarceration, threats of bodily harm & deportation, and brainwashing by the FBI & CIA. "
I'm not necessarily saying you're wrong - but is there any hard evidence of that ? witness statements? documentary evidence ?
-
@funkmasterjee Look at the video: Marina Oswald first interview.
It reveals how "out of sorts" she still is. I copied/posted some of the FBI/CIA incarceration statements. Note they are part of the WC record. Bertrand Russell in 1964 told the public she was under forced arrest for 9 weeks, 24/7.What would they doing with you for 9 weeks?
It was proven to be Oswald's face over Roscoe White's body, and that the CIA purchased the Z film. Dis-agents are here 24/7 to say otherwise
-
Progression of FBI & Marina Oswald statements after 9 weeks of illegal incarceration, threats of bodily harm & deportation, and brainwashing by the FBI & CIA.
12/3/63, FBI: "Marina said she had never seen Oswald practice with his rifle or any other firearm and he had never told her that he was going to practice". (22H763)
12/4/63, FBI: "She cannot recall ever hearing Oswald state that he was going to fire the rifle in practice or that he had fired it in practice". (22H785)
(continue below)
-
2/3/64, Marina's brainwashed appearance at the WC with a CIA interpreter.
Mr. Rankin: "Did you learn at any time that he had been practicing with the rifle"?
Mrs. Oswald (CIA): "I think he went once or twice. I didn't actually see him take the rifle, but I knew he was practicing".
Mr. Rankin: "Could you give us a little help on how you knew"?
Mrs. Oswald (CIA): "He told me. And he would mention that in passing, he would say, "Well, today I will take the rifle along for practice". (1H14-15)
-
@jacobji5 marina saw the rifle with her own two eyes. I generally agree with you but I think on this you're wrong. There is little doubt that Oswald purchased a rifle and revolver by mail order.
-
@abennett4 " Oswald's pistol had some work done on the barrel. That's why it didn't leave the markings on the bullets " - It doesn't matter. Then the revolver should STILL have matched up with the bullets. It didn't
-
@funkmasterjee Correction. Oswald did not own any gun. No rifle, no pistol, none. The picture in the backyard was Oswald's face pasted on DPD / CIA Roscoe White's body. Oswald's wife Marina originally denied taking any picture, until after she was brainwashed over a 9 week period from Dec to Jan. You should see the 1st interview of her afterward. It shows.
-
@abennett4 There's no proof the package contained a rifle. The shells found at the Tippet murder were the WRONG kind for a revolver (any revolver). They would have FALLEN OUT of a revolver.
There is no such thing as undersize shells - they are meant to work with a specific caliber ONLY
The bullets found in Tippet could not be proven to match Oswald's revolver.
And by the way - Oswald did not own a pistol, he owned a revolver
Yep.I've always wondered who owned it.
Didn't Zapruder sell it to Time Life who held onto it for a while and then sold it..no..gave..no sold it back to the Zapruder family who then sold it to someone else..I think..or maybe they sold it onto someone else..or maybe...they're waiting to have it given back to them so they can sell it again....and then wait to have it given back to them again so they can...sell it to someone else..Who owns it right now?
Or is it between sales..like sort of in limbo?
Mobilecheese 3 years ago
sorry i crapped over the interview audio with music, but you should check out the original interview with Bennet, cuz he clarifies some things about the film. the channel is:
TheQandACafe
and the interview starts here:
watch?v=ovkqqUYQ588
thanx
shitstinx 3 years ago