Upload

This video is unavailable.

Tim Jackson: An economic reality check

TEDtalksDirector TEDtalksDirector·1,422 videos
1,186,363

Subscription preferences

Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Working...
93,384
Like     Dislike 125

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like TEDtalksDirector's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike TEDtalksDirector's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add TEDtalksDirector's video to your playlist.

Uploaded on Oct 5, 2010

http://www.ted.com As the world faces recession, climate change, inequity and more, Tim Jackson delivers a piercing challenge to established economic principles, explaining how we might stop feeding the crises and start investing in our future.

TEDTalks is a daily video podcast of the best talks and performances from the TED Conference, where the world's leading thinkers and doers give the talk of their lives in 18 minutes. Featured speakers have included Al Gore on climate change, Philippe Starck on design, Jill Bolte Taylor on observing her own stroke, Nicholas Negroponte on One Laptop per Child, Jane Goodall on chimpanzees, Bill Gates on malaria and mosquitoes, Pattie Maes on the "Sixth Sense" wearable tech, and "Lost" producer JJ Abrams on the allure of mystery. TED stands for Technology, Entertainment, Design, and TEDTalks cover these topics as well as science, business, development and the arts. Closed captions and translated subtitles in a variety of languages are now available on TED.com, at http://www.ted.com/translate. Watch a highlight reel of the Top 10 TEDTalks at http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/top10

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

The interactive transcript could not be loaded.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.

Top Comments

  • omenworks

    ‎"This is a strange rather perverse story. Let me put it this way in very simple terms. It's a story about us people, being persuaded to spend money we don't have, on things we don't need to create impressions that won’t last on people we don't care about". - Tim Jackson

    · 21

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate omenworks's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate omenworks's comment.
  • John Doh

    Expanding on that issue using common sense that most people seem to lack, the Earth is not an unlimited supply of resources therefore has a tipping point as to its ability to sustain life. We r passed the tipping point. 1 good example of this is the worlds fisheries market that is starting to collapse as we have over fished the oceans

    · 13

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate John Doh's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate John Doh's comment.
    in reply to Nahojism (Show the comment)

All Comments (424)

Sign in now to post a comment!
  • Richard Hookway

    You can't change a system that's rotten to the core. Your "birth certificate" is your "date of manufacture". In this system you are property with privileges but no rights. There is no saving it. Fuck off liberal twats.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Richard Hookway's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Richard Hookway's comment.
  • madleinfrost

    Hello. Nice to have found your channel.

    · 4

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate madleinfrost's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate madleinfrost's comment.
  • Tutankh89

    You do raise a valid point, but it points towards the unsuitability of a capitalist growth model within a world of finite resource.

    A profit model designed where economic exploits are constrained by the global ecology doesn't mean profits aren't possible at all.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Tutankh89's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Tutankh89's comment.
    in reply to Emanuel Lindström (Show the comment)
  • Tutankh89

    He isn't saying economics has no place at all, but economics within the realms of constrained market environmentalism is a much preferential model.

    20% provides incentives for innovation within the realm of ecological economics from an economic perspective. A complete reliance on NGOs or legislation involves rebound from the corporate sector. It's a case of remedying the cause versus mitigating the effects (my opinion)

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Tutankh89's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Tutankh89's comment.
    in reply to economixxxx (Show the comment)
  • Tutankh89

    I understand your point in terms of price mechanisms. But please consider fossil fuel subsidies designed to mitigate price rises , huge mechanical reliance on FFuels etc.

    You overestimate the abilities of technological efficiencies as a means to achieve reductions of ecological impacts.

    Consider and research:

    Technological rebound&

    Relative vs absolute decoupling

    In order to achieve carbon reductions in a growth economy we require unprecedented levels of efficiency reductions never seen before

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Tutankh89's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Tutankh89's comment.
    in reply to risker15 (Show the comment)
  • Tutankh89

    I think you completely marginalise the choice by claiming it is a choice between the exploitation of resources or wildlife. Completely marginalise in fact.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Tutankh89's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Tutankh89's comment.
    in reply to leonpie (Show the comment)
  • daver744

    I think your missing the point. Its not a matter if earth can currently support a population. Its if it can continue to...

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate daver744's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate daver744's comment.
    in reply to saberur66 (Show the comment)
  • Patrick Hannan

    The little girl meant to say, "drafts". When she heard it before it sounded like giraffes to her so that's how she remembered it.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Patrick Hannan's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Patrick Hannan's comment.
    in reply to sarenace (Show the comment)
  • Pannsatannsa

    It just means that we are, quite obviously, very busy with our daily lives - and doing our bit in fighting climate change by e.g. insulating our windows - and that might inhibit big change, big thinking, big difference. So basically, we want to be good and do good things, but our individual efforts will not save the world (...) if we don't change the economic system our actions are embedded in.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Pannsatannsa's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Pannsatannsa's comment.
    in reply to sarenace (Show the comment)
  • sarenace

    err, this whole talk made absolutely no sense to me, especially "too busy keeping out the giraffes". I mean, wtf was with that reference???

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate sarenace's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate sarenace's comment.
  • Loading comment...
Loading...
Loading...
Working...
Sign in to add this to Watch Later