Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Two ufos?

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
82,577
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 14, 2007

I found this video and upload to se what are you thinking?Sems real but maybe is not.....Posible real

Before the terms "flying saucer" and "UFO" were coined in the late 1940s, there were a number of reports of strange, unidentified aerial phenomena. These reports date from the mid-nineteenth to early twentieth century. They include: * In July, 1868, The investigators of this phenomenon define the first modern documented sighting as having happened in Copiapo city, Chile.[6] * On January 25, 1878, The Denison Daily News wrote that local farmer John Martin had reported seeing a large, dark, circular flying object resembling a balloon flying "at wonderful speed." He compared its size when overhead to that of a "large saucer". [7] * Reports of "mystery airships" appeared in American newspapers in 1887 and 1896-7, and another wave of sightings occurred in 1909-12 in New England, Europe, and New Zealand. * On February 28, 1904, there was a sighting by three crew members on the USS Supply 300 miles west of San Francisco, reported by Lt. Frank Schofield, later to become Commander-in-Chief of the Pacific Battle Fleet. Schofield wrote of three bright red egg-shaped and circular objects flying in echelon formation that approached beneath the cloud layer, then changed course and "soared" above the clouds, departing directly away from the earth after 2 to 3 minutes. The largest had an apparent size of about six suns.[8][9] * An unusual phenomenon on November 17, 1882 was observed by astronomer Edward Walter Maunder of the Greenwich Royal Observatory and some other European astronomers. Numerous sighting reports were written up in Nature and other scientific journals. Maunder in The Observatory reported "a strange celestial visitor" that was "disc-shaped," "torpedo-shaped," "spindle-shaped," or "just like a Zeppelin" dirigible (as he described it in 1916). It was much brighter than the concurrent auroral displays, had well-defined edges and was opaque in the center, whitish or greenish-white, about 30 degrees long and 3 degrees wide, and moved steadily across the northern sky in less than 2 minutes from east to west. Maunder said it was very different in characteristics from a meteor fireball or any aurora he had ever seen. Nonetheless, Maunder (and some other astronomers) thought it was probably related to the huge auroral magnetic sunspot storm occurring at the same time; Maunder called it an "auroral beam." [10] * The so-called Fátima incident or "The Miracle of the Sun," witnessed by tens of thousands in Fátima, Portugal on October 13, 1917.

Drawing of E. W. Maunder's Nov. 17, 1882, "auroral beam" by astronomer Rand Capron, Guildown Observatory, Surrey, UK, who also observed it.
Drawing of E. W. Maunder's Nov. 17, 1882, "auroral beam" by astronomer Rand Capron, Guildown Observatory, Surrey, UK, who also observed it. * On 5 August 1926, while traveling in the Humboldt Mountains of Tibet's Kokonor region, Nicholas Roerich reported that members of his expedition saw--high in the sky, above an eagle they had been watching--"something big and shiny reflecting sun, like a huge oval moving at great speed" (from his travel diary Altai-Himalaya, published 1929). While Roerich does not say what he thought the object might have been, surrounding passages discuss Theosophical accounts of ancient civilizations and their technology.[11] * In both the European and Japanese aerial theatres during World War II, "Foo-fighters" (balls of light and other shapes that followed aircraft) were reported by both Allied and Axis pilots. * On February 25, 1942, the U.S. Army detected unidentified aircraft both visually and on radar over the Los Angeles, California region. The craft stayed aloft despite taking at least 20 minutes worth of flak from ground batteries. The origins of the aircraft were never identified. The incident later became known as the Battle of Los Angeles, or the West coast air raid. * In 1946, there were over 2000 reports of unidentified aircraft in the Scandinavian nations, along with isolated reports from France, Portugal, Italy and Greece, then referred to as "Russian hail," and later as "ghost rockets," because it was thought that these mysterious objects were Russian tests of captured German V1 or V2 rockets. This was subsequently shown not to be the case, and the phenomenon remains unexplained. Over 200 were tracked on radar and deemed to be "real physical objects" by the Swedish military. A significant fraction of the remainder was thought to be misidentification of natural phenomena, such as meteors.

Flying saucer aliens Spaceship Alien Atmospheric
ufologia space mars tape aliens real video
secret humanoid

  • likes, 91 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (195)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Who cares if its Fake! Isn't that obvious that when they made it they didn't care if it was or not? seriously, they put effort into making something and you people don't do jack shit.

  • fake

  • Adobe After Efects, i have too!

  • speed seems fake

  • @Mustangfilly2 I don't have beliefs, so i don't believe in god, i don't believe in hell, but i believe we are born, we grow up, we will get old, we will get deseases and we will die. And the science doesn't rescue, or save lives, but advance our living time and therefore, anyway, we will die. there is no paradise's souls, there is no any spirit, literally, everything finish with the death knocking at the door. So this is my true philosophy.

  • @TheFreedomly You never know. By the way, how the hell do you explain UFO's going zig zag FAST through the sky? So you people believe in god but not UFO's? That makes no sense.

  • @TheFreedomly

    Agreed, but personally I believe mathematically, it is impossible for us Earthlings to be the only ones. Hope one day there is reasonable evidence.

  • @Erectoralporicy I agree with, there are objects which they are parts of the universe composition, such as, meteores, comets, stars, moons and so on...This is a scientific evidences, but not spacecrafts from other planets at all. But from other planets, which those planets are parts of the universe composition, not anything with life form, til, scientists have evidences, or proof and so on... So, on the other hand, for such information, there is no ground.

  • @TheFreedomly

    There is no such thing as proof. It is impossible to prove something as an undeniable fact. You can only show evidence to support whatever it is you're trying to prove. That is why in court (Even when they have all the evidence in the world) you can only be found guilty 'beyond reasonable doubt'. This goes especially as a rule for science, and the scientific method.

  • @Erectoralporicy Everything, works with proof, no proof, no existence, science progresses, in showing proof of any existence, or showing proof of no any existence.

    So where is the proof?

    Who produced the proof?

    And which country, or countries did work togetherwith, on proof of their existence?

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more