@byramike I think the great thing with HDR is that the individual can finish the image to their personal taste. One person may like strong saturated colours, someone else will like a more realistic finish ........anything in between is possible the recipe is all yours.
I really don't like the effect photomatix has on photos in a more natural setting. It completely ruins it for me. Cities and Industrial sort of shots(machinery. Factories, etc) looks great though. Either way, I really really dislike photomatix and I don't use it anymore, but that's probably because I'm a landscape guy, but photomatix is really easy to use and it's wonderful if you want to get that "HDR effect" everybody seems to be going for these days; so long as you know what you're doing.
@MrGotemcoach You would want to use at least 3 photos: one under exposed, one over exposed and one and normal exposure. Usually you want to go one f/stop under/over than the normal exposure. But for the best results you should use 5 photos, each one going under/over the previous f/stop.
how many over exposed,under exposed and normal pictures does it take to get the best hdr result when you combine them?and at what exposure should i set each picture..if you or anyone could help me with this i would trully appreciate it.
All of the information about HDR Photography, provided on the internet, has been intended to assist and teach "Photographers" how to do this process. While it's easy to teach the shooting aspect, it's both time consuming and expensive to learn how to do the "proper" post-processing. If you look up Pro Photo Results / HDR Photography on YouTube, you will finally be able to get the finished post-processing done for you! You do not need to be a professional Photographer to accomplish this.
@byramike I think the great thing with HDR is that the individual can finish the image to their personal taste. One person may like strong saturated colours, someone else will like a more realistic finish ........anything in between is possible the recipe is all yours.
pedalman 1 week ago
I really don't like the effect photomatix has on photos in a more natural setting. It completely ruins it for me. Cities and Industrial sort of shots(machinery. Factories, etc) looks great though. Either way, I really really dislike photomatix and I don't use it anymore, but that's probably because I'm a landscape guy, but photomatix is really easy to use and it's wonderful if you want to get that "HDR effect" everybody seems to be going for these days; so long as you know what you're doing.
p0esbek 2 months ago
@MrGotemcoach You would want to use at least 3 photos: one under exposed, one over exposed and one and normal exposure. Usually you want to go one f/stop under/over than the normal exposure. But for the best results you should use 5 photos, each one going under/over the previous f/stop.
clos1983 3 months ago
good run through, thanks
Revilingfool 3 months ago
It got know nothing
Bunchpoland 5 months ago
@MrGotemcoach google is the answer to everything
alexander4115 5 months ago
how many over exposed,under exposed and normal pictures does it take to get the best hdr result when you combine them?and at what exposure should i set each picture..if you or anyone could help me with this i would trully appreciate it.
MrGotemcoach 6 months ago
All of the information about HDR Photography, provided on the internet, has been intended to assist and teach "Photographers" how to do this process. While it's easy to teach the shooting aspect, it's both time consuming and expensive to learn how to do the "proper" post-processing. If you look up Pro Photo Results / HDR Photography on YouTube, you will finally be able to get the finished post-processing done for you! You do not need to be a professional Photographer to accomplish this.
sandmancan2 6 months ago
I really don't like the final result at all. There were points in the process where it would have been made way better and you just went back on it.
byramike 7 months ago
it look like shit after you save it
1bboyred1 7 months ago