ClimateGate Interviews

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
9,777
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 12, 2009

I went out to interview environmentalists in order to get their perspective on ClimateGate.

  • likes, 124 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (762)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Are there any Myron Ebell shirts on sell somewhere?

  • the "trick" was to use REAL, measured temperatures (it is in the actual email, in the sentence quoted, but always left out by these global warming skeptics) instead of dendrological data, because for some reason this data has not correlated with measurements since 1960's. Other data sets do correlate (data from coral reefs, glaciers etc. all in all 12 different sets) with temperature. "Hiding" simply refers to decline in the erroneus data set that is caused by an unknown factor

  • @classic7890 Silly extremists can't accept reality

  • @VeryEvilPettingZoo

    LOL

    .

    . Silly deniers cannot even acept reality.

    .

    .

    Go troll some gaia site where your faith is taken seriously fool.

  • @classic7890

    lol - you wackos can't even rant coherently

  • @VeryEvilPettingZoo You`re done because you are a naive fool. Specifically, either an ignorant tree hugging pagan gaia kook or a knowing Totalitarian such as IPCC lead authors and Van Jones, who MOW ADMIT the AGW theory is simply a trojan horse for EVERYONE know that if CO2 DROVE temps then + feedback would have be catastrophic to all life on Earth. But of course we know your AGW theory of that very idea is a laughably Big Lie..

    .

    Yes indeed, you`re done denier.

  • @classic7890

    You're either extremely stupid, or a troll. Either way, I'm done with you.

  • @VeryEvilPettingZoo

    LOL

    .

    . You corrected your own error denier !!!

    .

    . LOL

    .

    . So far you failed to refute a single thing I`ve said, merely engage in misquotations, ignorant of IPCC lead authors` admitting the fraudulent data is for political purposes, failed confidence levels, failed data EVEN AFTER THE USE OF + MULTIPLIERS,the insignificance of anthropogenic CO2 ( 0.12%) , the inclusion of +9C heat island data, the refusal to release methodology, ad infinitum.

  • (cont)

    Re: "...as the evidence of govt funded propagandist "scientists" is now overwhelming"

    And the evidence that 9-11 was an inside job is now overwhelming too. And alien lizard people run the New World Order.

    Crazy people are always eager to tell everyone about the overwhelming evidence proving their conspiracy theories. And when examined (as if that were even required to dismiss the nuts) - as I did with your posts - the end result is that they're just crazy people ignorantly spouting off

  • (cont)

    He then has a section about the energy budget discussing "... the flows of energy through the climate system." Etc. It's all right there.

    Now I described this as "scientist refering to his published paper in which he gripes that our inability to do energy accounting WITHIN the earth climate system (NOT the net imbalance that we can account for that's driving the recent warming)."

    I was correct. You were not. I stand with the scientists. You stand with the whacko deniers.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more