the "trick" was to use REAL, measured temperatures (it is in the actual email, in the sentence quoted, but always left out by these global warming skeptics) instead of dendrological data, because for some reason this data has not correlated with measurements since 1960's. Other data sets do correlate (data from coral reefs, glaciers etc. all in all 12 different sets) with temperature. "Hiding" simply refers to decline in the erroneus data set that is caused by an unknown factor
@VeryEvilPettingZoo You`re done because you are a naive fool. Specifically, either an ignorant tree hugging pagan gaia kook or a knowing Totalitarian such as IPCC lead authors and Van Jones, who MOW ADMIT the AGW theory is simply a trojan horse for EVERYONE know that if CO2 DROVE temps then + feedback would have be catastrophic to all life on Earth. But of course we know your AGW theory of that very idea is a laughably Big Lie..
. So far you failed to refute a single thing I`ve said, merely engage in misquotations, ignorant of IPCC lead authors` admitting the fraudulent data is for political purposes, failed confidence levels, failed data EVEN AFTER THE USE OF + MULTIPLIERS,the insignificance of anthropogenic CO2 ( 0.12%) , the inclusion of +9C heat island data, the refusal to release methodology, ad infinitum.
Re: "...as the evidence of govt funded propagandist "scientists" is now overwhelming"
And the evidence that 9-11 was an inside job is now overwhelming too. And alien lizard people run the New World Order.
Crazy people are always eager to tell everyone about the overwhelming evidence proving their conspiracy theories. And when examined (as if that were even required to dismiss the nuts) - as I did with your posts - the end result is that they're just crazy people ignorantly spouting off
He then has a section about the energy budget discussing "... the flows of energy through the climate system." Etc. It's all right there.
Now I described this as "scientist refering to his published paper in which he gripes that our inability to do energy accounting WITHIN the earth climate system (NOT the net imbalance that we can account for that's driving the recent warming)."
I was correct. You were not. I stand with the scientists. You stand with the whacko deniers.
Are there any Myron Ebell shirts on sell somewhere?
AwesomeCoasters 3 months ago
the "trick" was to use REAL, measured temperatures (it is in the actual email, in the sentence quoted, but always left out by these global warming skeptics) instead of dendrological data, because for some reason this data has not correlated with measurements since 1960's. Other data sets do correlate (data from coral reefs, glaciers etc. all in all 12 different sets) with temperature. "Hiding" simply refers to decline in the erroneus data set that is caused by an unknown factor
arpakyna 10 months ago
@classic7890 Silly extremists can't accept reality
david52875 11 months ago
@VeryEvilPettingZoo
LOL
.
. Silly deniers cannot even acept reality.
.
.
Go troll some gaia site where your faith is taken seriously fool.
classic7890 1 year ago
@classic7890
lol - you wackos can't even rant coherently
VeryEvilPettingZoo 1 year ago
@VeryEvilPettingZoo You`re done because you are a naive fool. Specifically, either an ignorant tree hugging pagan gaia kook or a knowing Totalitarian such as IPCC lead authors and Van Jones, who MOW ADMIT the AGW theory is simply a trojan horse for EVERYONE know that if CO2 DROVE temps then + feedback would have be catastrophic to all life on Earth. But of course we know your AGW theory of that very idea is a laughably Big Lie..
.
Yes indeed, you`re done denier.
classic7890 1 year ago
@classic7890
You're either extremely stupid, or a troll. Either way, I'm done with you.
VeryEvilPettingZoo 1 year ago
@VeryEvilPettingZoo
LOL
.
. You corrected your own error denier !!!
.
. LOL
.
. So far you failed to refute a single thing I`ve said, merely engage in misquotations, ignorant of IPCC lead authors` admitting the fraudulent data is for political purposes, failed confidence levels, failed data EVEN AFTER THE USE OF + MULTIPLIERS,the insignificance of anthropogenic CO2 ( 0.12%) , the inclusion of +9C heat island data, the refusal to release methodology, ad infinitum.
classic7890 1 year ago
(cont)
Re: "...as the evidence of govt funded propagandist "scientists" is now overwhelming"
And the evidence that 9-11 was an inside job is now overwhelming too. And alien lizard people run the New World Order.
Crazy people are always eager to tell everyone about the overwhelming evidence proving their conspiracy theories. And when examined (as if that were even required to dismiss the nuts) - as I did with your posts - the end result is that they're just crazy people ignorantly spouting off
VeryEvilPettingZoo 1 year ago
(cont)
He then has a section about the energy budget discussing "... the flows of energy through the climate system." Etc. It's all right there.
Now I described this as "scientist refering to his published paper in which he gripes that our inability to do energy accounting WITHIN the earth climate system (NOT the net imbalance that we can account for that's driving the recent warming)."
I was correct. You were not. I stand with the scientists. You stand with the whacko deniers.
VeryEvilPettingZoo 1 year ago