The armenian church is NOT Orthodox Christian but remains a body of Monophysiticism
Uploader Comments (TheMistAnchorite)
All Comments (300)
-
@SuryoyoSpirit ..how right you are...
-
oh..cut it out..stop..stop..stop..do you honestly think that most Orthodox & or Armemian Christians...know or care about Monophysites,Dyophysites....or all the other "Byzantine"verbal-hair-splits"
....&...yes Jesus Christ is the Body of Christ,aka the Church....&..maybe has something to-do with all your word-battles...but i doubt that a Loving-God would be so petty...but in the hands of politics & human ambition all nutsness is possible. -
hey ppl, don't even quarrel with this son of the biggest bitch!!! just fuck him and his mother , he likes that ;))))))))))) for sure!
-
@0546897855 He is one of the most smartest Turks i've ever heard.
Thank You for your videos MistAnchorite.
-
understand what we are talking about, and logically if you also accept the first three Councils that means you can't talk about Armenian church like that which means it relate to you too. if you were here I would explain to you misinformed and misunderstand teaching. I really feel sorry for you....
miaphysite, not mono.Miaphysitism holds that in the one person of Jesus Christ, Divinity and Humanity are united in one or single nature ("physis"), the two being united without separation, without confusion, and without alteration. If what your saying is true, I can not go take communion in an Eastern Orthodox or Catholic Church, guess what, its allowed.
SakoPasha 2 weeks ago
@SakoPasha This distinction of 'extreme' vs. ' moderate' Monophysites refers to the fact that Evtyches declared simply one nature”and would accept no elaboration, whereas Dioscorus and others permitted this to be modified or explained to mean one new composite nature, one nature from out of two I accept, but two natures after the union,I cannot accept,he said such was his moderation in either case,it means that the Divine nature suffered and died and had all the natural human passions
TheMistAnchorite 2 weeks ago
Meletios Kalamaras refers to Dioskoros "as being of the same mind as Evtychios."
TheMistAnchorite 3 weeks ago
g) If Dioskoros were not a Monophysite, he would at least have recognized the Definition of Faith of the Fourth (Ecumenical Synod, which in no uncertain terms defined the Christological Dogma regarding the two natures of the Lord. Meletios Kalamaras refers to Dioskoros "as being of the same mind as Evtychios."
TheMistAnchorite 3 weeks ago
e) If Dioskoros were Orthodox, he would have come and appeared at the Fourth Ecumenical Synod and would have confessed the Orthodox Faith, or at the very least, he would have rejected Monophysitism in writing.
f) If Dioskoros were not a Monophysite, he would not have written that the blood which was shed by Christ upon the Cross "was by nature God's and not man's"8 something which, without doubt, proves his belief that God suffered.
TheMistAnchorite 3 weeks ago
d) At the Fourth (Ecumenical Synod, Dioskoros was under the accusation of heresy, lodged against him by St. Leo of Rome, whom Dioskoros had previously anathematized as a heretic for his Tome. With this accusation Dioskoros was "first judged and -deposed as a heretic, since it was evident that he had deposed the most Orthodox St. Flavian as a heretic."'
TheMistAnchorite 3 weeks ago