Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

What darwinists said, what happened then (Harun Yahya)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
251 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jul 3, 2011

For 150 years Darwinists committed fraud. They distorted scientific facts and deceived people. Because they would not be able to prove their claims by science, they have taken refuge in demagogy, propoganda and fraud. However all their claims were eliminated by scientific evidence. Their forgery has been proved.
What darwinists said and what happened:
Ida hoax
What Darwinists said:
95 percent of its fossil remains are preserved intact, revealing that it is an utter lemur. Darwinists declared to be the "ancestor of man" since it had bendable thumb and nails.
What Happened:
It was understood that bendable thumb and nails were features peculiar to primates and that the fossil in question was an extinct lemur. Darwinist scientists described the depiction of this fossil as an evidence for the evolution of man as "buffoonery", "media circus", "a source of shame", "nonsense" and "a stalemate for evolution".
Ardi Hoax
What Darwinists said:
They said they discovered the most important upright walking ancestor of man.
What happened:
It is understood that in order to give the fragmented pelvis the appearance of an upright walking living being, it is joined together in a particular form. It became obvious that the fossil belongs to nothing but a bonobo ape.
The Piltdown Man Hoax
What Darwinists said:
Darwinists said it was the greatest evidence of the imaginary evolution of man. It was displayed in British Museum for 40 years as the ancestor of man.

What Happened:
Piltdown man turned out to be the greatest paleontological hoax in history. The hoax find consisted of fragments of a 500 year-old orangutan jawbone mounted on a human skull of today. The teeth were rasped and the skull was worn out by potassium dichromate.

The Nebraska Man Hoax
What Darwinists said:
Darwinists claimed it was the imaginary ape ancestor of man and made illustrations of Nebraska man and its entire family.

What Happened:
It turned out to be that what they called the Nebraska man consisted of only the tooth of a peccary, an extinct animal similar to (and closely related to) pigs. "Hesperopithecus (The Nebraska Man) dethroned" (The Times (London), Feb. 21, p. 16)
The Coelacanth Deceit
What Darwinists said:
Darwinists said it was an extinct transitional form from sea to land with lungs and feet that were about to form.

What Happened:
Living Coelacanths are caught various times in our day. What they called the lung was understood to be an oil sac while the so-called feet were fins. It was understood that it was a deep-sea fish which could not survive in shallow waters.


The Lucy Deceit
What Darwinists said:
It was claimed to be one of the earliest so-called ape ancestors of man.

What Happened:
The examinations on the fossil revealed that, all its features, including its gait, were peculiar to chimpanzees, certifying that Lucy was a chimpanzee.


Haeckel's False Embryonic Stages
What Darwinists said:
Looking at Haeckel's drawings, Darwinists claimed that in the development stages of human in mother's womb, there exists a so-called evolution from frog to human embryo, and that a similar evolution is experienced among species.

What Happened:
It was understood that Haeckel's embryo drawings were fake, and that he deliberately displayed different living beings' embryo drawings as human embryo. Haeckel confessed his forgery as follows:

After this compromising confession of "forgery" I should be obliged to consider myself condemned and annihilated if I had not the consolation of seeing side by side with me in the prisoner's dock hundreds of fellow-culprits, among them many of the most trusted observers and most esteemed biologists. The great majority of all the diagrams in the best biological textbooks, treatises and journals would incur in the same degree the charge of "forgery," for all of them are inexact, and are more or less doctored, schematised and constructed (Francis Hitching, The Neck of the Giraffe: Where Darwin Went Wrong, New York: Ticknor and Fields 1982, p.204)

The Horse Series Myth
What Darwinists said:
Darwinists claimed that 50 million years ago horse of our day descended from a four--nailed living being the size of a fox. To verify this claim, they, in their own way, formed a sequence of extinct living beings that had by no means any interspecies connection. They formed the horse series by aligning short-to-tall living beings with decreasing nail-numbers.

What Happened:
Due to the recently uncovered fossils the horse series were amended many times. At last it appeared that horse series were a hoax made up of living beings with different nail numbers dating back to different dates. With the discovery of a 47 million-year-old horse skull the hoax was revealed.

  • likes, 4 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (0)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more