Energy Independence -- Yes on 87
Loading...
Loading...
5,989
Link to this comment:
Share to:
Loading...
- 31:28President Clinton's full speech at the C40 Larg...by clintonfoundationorg3,893 views
- 2:32Robert Redford Supports Proposition 87by Prop875,728 views
- 3:45Glenn Beck's Real Story - Energy Independenceby GlennBeckVideos45,241 views
- 0:31Clean Airby Prop8711,139 views
- 4:14President Bill Clinton for Prop 87by Prop871,600 views
- 0:33Change the Courseby Prop87917 views
- 27:45Bill Clinton at the Clean Energy Summit at UNLVby SenatorReid802 views
- 5:32Bill Clinton: How to create a TRILLION dollar i...by savetheearth1260,857 views
- 0:50Hillary on Energy Independanceby tbonedaddy1171,110 views
- 9:26Interview of Doctors whos diet Bill Clinton use...by exposecorruptivegov10,512 views
- 5:43Tom Valone Ph.D. - UFOs, Energy, Cover up 1/2by TOAFN15,802 views
- 12:15Bill Clinton on Obama: 'I Think He'll Be Re-ele...by PBSNewsHour10,350 views
- 0:31Votaby Prop87259 views
- 3:11Bill Clinton On Green Solutionsby vibinc196 views
- 2:23Congress Energy Bill Speedreading Atrocityby StopDestroyingtheUS4,237 views
- 1:10:21Gingrich Testimony On The Waxman-Markey Energy ...by AmericanSolutions20,853 views
- 2:49Energy Bill Speed Readerby CSPAN16,662 views
- 2:01CGI 2007: Brad Pitt Discusses Energy & Climateby clintonfoundationorg29,695 views
- 0:31Aire Limpioby Prop87137 views
- 11:33BILL RICHARDSON: Energy Plan Goalsby Politicstv3,434 views
"If Brazil can do it, so can California"
No, you can't.
MelchBurg 1 year ago
Imagine using our own resources in Anwar, North & South Dakota and the Rockies. Imagine a small group of dope smokers not running the other 98%......Imagine the jobs, the industry and freedom..............
Drumboy5165 1 year ago
YES on 87!
spscwby944 5 years ago
YES ON 87!
soccer4ever 5 years ago
The point here is that big oil is getting oil from California soil on the cheap. They should pay us just like they pay Alaska and Texas.
bimplebean 5 years ago
I can agree with that clean air solution. What I don't agree with, is here in the USA, politicians punish us with taxes for using products we need. They punish us with taxes and waste the money somewhere else and in the Prop87 document, there is no guarantee that the money will help make anything come true. Bill Clinton is a liar, that doesn't help. The government cannot use money wisely, that doesn't help us either. Private industry makes dreams come true, not the government.
RacerXGTO 5 years ago
But after all, its a very good tecnology, doesn't destroy your car, its cheaper than gasoline, but gasoline in Brasil is expensive, like 1 dollar the litter, but the more important point is that the tecnology its totally renewable, not releasing more carbon in atmosphere.. Thats important.
marcodebona 5 years ago
I don't know if you guys know, but in Brasil (With s, please)80% of the cars sold here (actually there, cause I'm in Italy)are "flexfuel" cars, we can use only ethanol, only gasoline or one mixture of them in any proportion, and with this we are safe when ethanol prices arises, since ethanol production and sugar productio competes for the same raw material, sugar cane, and when sugar cane prices arises, the producers preferres to produce sugar cane nor ethanol... Aren't them smart...
marcodebona 5 years ago
Maybe the companies will look for profit, not for the enviroment... Why do you think we all around the world (I'm brazilian) have problems with pollution... because its not reliable, you cant make profit, you will allways have to spend money, without return in money.
marcodebona 5 years ago
American oil companies are not the evil that politicians point them out to be. Chevron is smart to support the NO vote. For them it means less government hassle to make a product we all use and buy. It also means that government does not get to waste tax dollars, which they waste very well. Private industry will find cleaner solutions on their own, without government.
RacerXGTO 5 years ago