Ron Paul: Suspend The Income Tax For 3-4 Years! (CNBC 1/2)

http://www.RonPaul.com

In his appearance on CNBC's Squawk Box this morning, Ron Paul talked briefly about his CPAC Presidential Straw Poll victory, his intentions for 2012, and his growing support among young people.

The Congressman offered an affordable alternative to the government's wasteful bailouts and stimulus plans: simply suspend the income tax for 3 or 4 years and let the people decide how the money is spent.

He explained that monetary policy and foreign policy can't be separated because the Federal Reserve is the chief enabler of foreign adventures and aggressive wars.

(Foreign policy discussion continues in Part 2)

For more information visit the following sites:

http://www.RonPaul.com
http://www.CampaignForLiberty.com
http://www.house.gov/paul
http://www.DailyPaul.com
http://www.RonPaulForums.com

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• squawk box
• cnbc
• ron paul
• income tax
• stimulus
• bailout
• cpac
• 2012
• president
• monetary policy

[williamwagener]

Yes, suspend IRS and the FEDERAL INCOME TAX for 5 years. AUDIT the Federal Reserve.

[jfn1103]

@ManufacturedThoughts The united states government is the largest terrorist organization in the world. The Federal Reserve is the largest cartel monopoly in the world.

[joseph43211234]

Ron Paul 2012 !!!!!

[ChemicalMikeUK]

if your truly serious about helping the economy ron, you would suspend the tax on fuel! wouldnt that be more beneficial and more realistic?

[Eye2EyeIIIV]

@Spjungen

"You shall not PASSSSSSSS... Unconstitutional Bills!"

[Spjungen]

@Eye2EyeIIIV Lol he should wear a wizard outfit and grow a beard =P

[Eye2EyeIIIV]

Let's get this Gandalf-looking guy into the White House!

[7smoke7gray7]

he has been in congress how long now since the late 70's seems he is part of the problem not the solution..congress has control and he was there through it all..and because of him and his conglomerate buddies we are in the state we are in now!!!!!!!

[ransom22]

@MrFarcry1966 I agree with Paul on this because I've studied it myself. You're right that the initial causes were somewhat different. 1920 was caused by the overspending in WW I. 1929 was caused by overspending domestically. I find it strange that you would consider Keynes to be a "sane economic mind" when his ideas have been proved wrong again and again. Please don't misunderstand a difference of view point of lack of understanding. Closed mindedness doesn't suit you.