Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Neuroethics & the Trolley Dilemma

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
5,475
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 30, 2009

A five-minute introduction to an intriguing moral problem and what it tells us about how we decide what is right and what is wrong.

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (MassimoPigliucci)

  • You are missing the point. It's about the type of choice you'd make, not whether it would actually work in a real life situation.

  • Epydemic, yes, that is correct. There are different approaches to ethics that would not consider the two versions of the dilemma equivalent.

  • GP, I haven't written much on consequentialism, but I've been thinking quite a bit about it! (I tend toward virtue ethics myself...)

Top Comments

  • Interesting, because I most likely wouldn't touch anything if I were in that situation. I wonder how many people answered that and if they studied those people's brains?

  • Thanks, Massimo! I know Greene himself is a pretty hardcore consequentialist but I think I remember you criticizing consequentialism on Rationally Speaking a while ago. I could be thinking of something else. Have you written on consequentialism before?

see all

All Comments (14)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The one thing I never understood about this problem placing it on a real life situation is how throwing one man onto an out of control trolley will stop the trolley killing the other 5? No matter how big his person is the only thing I can see is just a really messy situation. Most likely if I throw that other person all 6 of them will die without a lever to change tracks

  • Interestingly, having the neurological correlates mapped out leads me to question the faith we put in logical reasoning at the expense of emotion or intuition. In part because we cannot always know the consequences, and in some cases do not have the ability (or time) to logically analyze a situation completely, it is important to have a set of principles defining moral acts (as well as moral consequences). A sense of duty or obligation is actually embedded in either view.

  • i agree with the gentlemen below me

  • Excellent video.

  • Cool video.

    One critique tho, calling the two alternatives of the trolley dilemma "ethically equivalent" is only true if you are a consequentialist of some sort.

  • I'm in the process of making a video about Joshua Greene's take on the trolley problem...This video helped me to clarify my thoughts on this...

    Btw you might want to add "Joshua Greene" to the tags?

  • Keep the videos coming Massimo! They're great!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more