Mil Mi-35 Hind

Helicoptero de assalto/ataque Russo !


Combat helicopter Russian !

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

• Helicóptero
• de
• combate
• /
• combat
• helicopter
• Mil-Mi
• Mil-Mi-35

[fernandorc]

Mil-MI-35 now in Brazilian Air Force =)

[fernandorc]

Mil MI-24 is sovietic, but Mil-Mi-35 is Russian =)

thanks for your post.

Regards

[fernandorc]

Peoples,

this video is for demostrate the machine, dont "this better than those" ok.

tks

[nikomo37]

It's modified for western market, but technology is eastern (Russian)

[Talshet]

@Suyamu Not Only the KA-52 has ejection seats. Mil Mi-28 has ejection free fall system.The rotorblades will not blow away but the pilots will eject to site down they have a big matress to lead the pilots far away from rotor blades. And the KA50 has ejections seats to like KA-52. russian build the heaviest armored and armed helicopters and the safest.

[fabriciobrisola1]

the advantage in my opinion would be very minimal depending on the experience of each pilot in his aircraft! Apache has more (aiming gun capascete grouped in the pilot that would benefit to the Apache!) do not know if the M-35 has the same TECHNOLOGICAL

Although most of the two are very deadly

[Suyamu]

@davedavedaveannoy1

Our "cheap and inexpensive" designs are actually quite robust and do their job very well.

The "just throwing things at the enemy" is again a myth formed from hollywood and videogames.

You have to consider that hollywood was a propaganda instrument during cold war.

Military strategy and tactics were always of big importance for Russia, our military schools still teach many Officers from all around the world. Our instructors and advisors were present in many hotspots.

[davedavedaveannoy1]

@Suyamu Oh please, don't give me that videogame bullshit, I have seen your tank series and am utterly disappointed, quite frankly your plans seem to revolve around manufacturing an immense load of cheap inexpensive garbage (en mass) then throw it at the enemy with little to no care for the individuals involved, after all, they are expendable. However, I will admit, your Kalashnikova impressed me significantly.

[Suyamu]

@davedavedaveannoy1

shows what you know of our military.

You should stop substituting history lessons with hollywood movies and videogames.

[davedavedaveannoy1]

@Suyamu Just because you can conscript millions of idiots, give them AKs, and throw them into the frontlines like cannon fodder doesn't necessarily mean you are the best, in fact, considering your method, China is the best.

[Suyamu]

@davedavedaveannoy1

Russia has more modern helicopters than the Mi-24. Mi-28 and Ka-52 carry all the state of the art electronics you can expect.

Still they all go down when hit by a missile - in fact Russian attack helicopter probably carry heavier armor than western ones and Ka-52 even has ejection seats unlike any western helicopter.

There was always competition, internal as well as competition on the export market.

Also: We have the best military in the world. :)

[davedavedaveannoy1]

@Suyamu True, but our systems are more modern, up to date, and have state-of-the-art components, they do have their kinds and they sure as hell are expensive but they would stand a better chance then a half asses piece of iron with a rotor on top and missiles slung on the side. Competition creates technological advances, not the pursuit of the common good, have you ever wondered why we have (or at least had till liberal era) the best economy and military in the world?

[Suyamu]

@davedavedaveannoy1

uh - "infantry launched rockets" can take down western aircraft just as well - that's what they're made for.

[NastyNatey]

I want to see the Hind and Apache face off. Would be an awesome battle, I wonder who would win?