"Antigravity" Method 13 of 15 Gyroscopic Mechanical Electromechanical Inertial centrifugal Group IV

Antigravity Method 13 of 15 Gyroscopic Mechanical / Electromechanical/ Inertial Impulse, Centrifugal- Group IV
Filmed 1991-1996, 13 of 15 methods of levitating an object known to the author John Iwaszko, edited from the video Antigravity the reality made in 1996. The antigravity method shown in this edit, was introduced and was referred to as Asymmetric Gyroscopic which has now been reclassified by the author as, GYROSCOPIC MECHANICAL /ELECTROMECHANICAL/ Inertial impulse centrifugal (Method 13)
The classification of the antigravity methods I have developed was an attempt to classify according to certain functional, structural properties and methodology of the systems. Whereas the structural properties are largely intrinsic, functional properties and the derived classifications depend to a certain degree on the type of interaction relative to the external environment. Some of the systems mix the various methods, resulting in hierarchies based on structural qualities.
The method I will next describe has been the cause of tremendous controversy amongst learned people and is the only method that can, so far, produce tangible and a measurable artificial gravity. Befitting and Ironic then that this method described coincidently fell in a numerical order of number 13. Perhaps the symbolism that relates to number 13 also relates to this method.
So whats is creating the defying gravity antiques within the box, here it is balancing 130 grams with no counterweight on the opposing lever. It is none other than a gyroscope.
Here we have an elementary experiment, a balanced system, I place an object on a platform, give it a little spin, and behold the object does not topple or fall as I have just created artificial gravity.
This simple method has been utilised in theme parks and unquestionably in future space vehicles and space stations and has been experienced in some form by most people. Centrifugal force represents the effects of inertia that arise in connection with rotation and which are experienced as an outward force away from the centre of rotation and pushes the object towards the platform keeping the little object firmly stable at a constant velocity of rotation. At a certain rate of rotation we can beat gravity. Everyone who has swung any heavy object around themselves has felt the centrifugal force. This 'force' can simulate gravity particularly where there is no solid surface to enable us to feel the forces of gravity. The centrifugal force is in a direction perpendicular to the rotation axis and radically outward. Its magnitude is equal to the square of the angular speed times the distance from the rotation axis. As a result the astronauts in a space station would be able to walk around inside the space station as if the artificial gravity is pulling them outward away from the centre of a toroidal or cylindrical station.
For a space station 15 metres in radius (50 feet) the station must make one revolution about every 8 seconds in order that the astronauts feel 1 g of gravitational acceleration where a persons weight would be the same as that on Earth.
WARNING:- Some of these experiments operate directly from 240VAC mains supply or far higher voltages at high currents are potentially lethal. Do not build unless you know exactly what you are doing. Do not touch any part of the equipment while it is plugged into a mains outlet. And remember that the methods described do not conform to any electrical safety standard and many of the experiments performed are downright dangerous.
Powerful magnets such as neodymium magnets or powerful magnetic fields generated by coils can be dangerous and not to be played with. Powerful magnets or magnetic fields can crush fingers. The power of magnetism can also cause chunks of metal to take flight and cause injury to body parts and or blindness.
Rotating machinery can pose a danger from rotating or reciprocating parts. Particularly when machine parts move toward each other, or one part moves past another, which can crush limbs.
Extremely intense sounds can burst ear drums or can be physically painful to human ears. High-intensity ultrasound waves are extremely dangerous to experiment with as they can heat human eyes or other tissue by absorbing ultrasound energy which becomes heat by vibration and corresponding energy loss.
Exposure to radio frequency energy or ionizing radiation that can be generated by coils can not only burn as they get hot but also cause radiation burns, damage to the skin or other biological tissue.
Direct skin contact with liquid nitrogen will cause severe frostbite (cryogenic or cold burns). This may happen almost instantly on contact, there is always a potential hazard when handling liquid nitrogen.
Be careful! Use good solid judgement in your work, and think ahead. I John Iwaszko do not endorse the experiments shown, and am merely passing on information, I have learnt through experiment. Safety is your responsibility!

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• magnetic
• electromagnetic
• alien
• John Iwaszko
• Foucault
• rattle back
• free energy
• levitating
• precession
• gyroscope
• Thornson
• Inertial impulse
• centrifugal
• centripetal
• force
• rotating inertial mass
• zero spin
• torque
• rotational
• energy
• physic
• space station
• gyro
• levitron
• moment of momentum
• Mechanics
• Newton's laws
• spinning top
• angular velocity
• climate
• electronics
• environment
• technology
• ufo

[Pendor42]

this is the best thing i've stumbled across in ages

[spand3244]

Very interesting dr JohnROMANIWASZKO. perhaps, if gravity now can bend the electromagnetic field, then why can't the opposite do work? maby something has to be changed in maxwell equations? But its looks like this gyroscopic is an important component also.

[william69952]

@nicktesla45 good for you , by the way , who asked you ?

[nicktesla45]

That is good for attitude control but that is about it. To create anti-gravity First you have to know what Gravity Is and what it is Not! Most scientist on earth do Not know shit about Exactly what gravity Is. How can you create an Anti-something unless you Know what that something Is ? Morons ha ha ha !! I KNOW Exactly what creates gravity is and the 4 Universal Factors that create it And I Know Exactly How to Build a Flying Saucer. I got that information straight from a Starship Captain !

[xlr99]

I was wondering if it is possible to form a series of coils into a gyroscope that can be pushed and pulled by electomagnets mounted on opposite sides along the circumference to lift and move the device. My idea would be that the gyroscope and magnets are mounted on the same rig and that the magnets would be powerful enough to lift the entire rig.

[cobra60six]

Interesting subject, seems to be a lot of hate here though

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

@flowerbower Do you know what thought thought? Do you think that I care about being challenged by self professed experts such as yourself, LOL? “Oh the experts are coming I better say the right thing!” LOL. My only reason for using quotation marks are to indicate that the word “antigravity” is or is not being used in its current commonly accepted sense, as like yourself, many seem to have created their own definition in their own minds, yours the distillation of hundreds of years of theory, LOL!

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

@flowerbower Alternatively it is sad to see a self professed brilliant mind and a lifetime of studying physics end up a troll on youtube. Very sad. What are my “outrageous claims”, that you seek proof for!

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

@flowerbower How deplorable it is that a man with some literary powers and claimed knowledge of physics should spend all their time attacking others. I really doubt you have any brilliance, a brilliant man would be engaged in their work, and would not waste time trolling on youtube!

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

@flowerbower My impression of you, the nature of you and your life’s work main claim to fame is your persistent attacts on Searl, is this the greatest achievement of your life as a physicist? Is this all that you have achieved in your brilliant career as a Physicist or at least claim, as you offer no proof, how sad. Once again I pity you.

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

@flowerbower There are two virtues in the world the true and the false, the false are based upon vanity, and the true are based on unselfishness.

What have you achieved other than your self professed egotistic vanity. Which makes me pity you; a nobel person would never put down the works of another simply to gratify their own vanity.

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

@flowerbower You claim your information is a distillation of hundreds of years of theory, what the! Are you claiming to have read hundreds of years of theory, in a mere lifetime? Yes I am incapable of imagining the brilliance of some of our forefathers of science, but your statement appears to put yourself in their league, oh WOW a professional physicist, you think yourself a god by your statement! How you gratify your own vanity. Your vanity is simply phenomenal.