New test of the E-cat enhances proof of heat

Video by Mats Lewan of Ny Teknik, showing the test of Andrea Rossi's 'E-cat' energy catalyser, allegedly using a Ni-H nuclear reaction to generate heat, carried out on Oct. 6th., 2011. The catalyser ran for nearly 4 hours in 'self-sustaining mode', generating approximately 14 kWh of heat during that time, as measured by the rise in temperature of flowing water heated by the catalyser. The test is described in detail in the article by Lewan at http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/energi/article3284823.ece.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• e-cat
• Rossi reactor
• nuclear energy

[CaveManLabs]

Lets see, the hydrogen is feed into the system. This is filling the internal tank up with hydrogen gas, the hydrogen is powering this unit with the help of a electrolysis to produce heat..Does not sound like any cold fusion too me. If you insulate a heat reactor enough, it will produce steam for a long time, this is a trick to fool people.

[cogito2]

@CaveManLabs The general opinion of those who have looked into it in detail is that the numbers don't work out.

[Aleque]

i would not be surprised if he is already assassinated and his invention contrabanded by the "government".. the world is in the hands of the oil companies, and as long as people give value to current currencies, they shall not be free

[cogito2]

@Aleque I don't know about that, but someone who is obviously threatened by the E-cat has been busy trying to stop people knowing of the White House petition re the E-cat by defining baddoggie's below as spam (both here and on our FAQ video).

[boxingisbest]

@goblin003 What the fuck is your problem? this is science and no one is yet saying its working they say it could be working and Rossi says he is going to prove that its working so why not just wait until he does? BEING NEGATIVE LEADS TO NOTHING!! science is for the optimists and those who search for new ways not the ones that keeps bitching about every single possible failures

[GreatInca]

Lets start doing some real work with this thing. Produce electricity. Produce useful propulsion. Something. Fake until then.

[ImMichaelTaylor]

@boxingisbest "science is for the optimists" No, it categorically is not. Science is for people who are objective, want to find out if something is true or false regardless of which is most emotionally satisfying, and don't just believe something because it feels pleasant to believe it.

"Rossi says he is going to prove that its working so why not just wait until he does"

Why don't you?

[ImMichaelTaylor]

@runningman97 " you can't censor the truth for long, especially in the internet age."

That's true, but you can drown it out with seductive lies.

The truth is that there are a variety of feasible alternatives to fossil fuels already independently proven to produce enough net energy output to provide clean electricity and fuel for everyone.

Hoping that a new one will be adopted where the others weren't fails to address the reasons why the others weren't.

[runningman97]

@bongo7654 Well with such a defeatist attitude you may as well just lay down and wait for death to come. If this is indeed genuine then the 'power brokers' will not have a choice because you can't censor the truth for long, especially in the internet age. They only have the control they do because of the scarcity of energy resources and as soon as word gets out the game will be up. Well they had a good run eh?

[bongo7654]

Don't know if this guy is legit or not,but,even if he is,does anyone really believe that the power brokers would actually allow us "little people" to profit from this technology? No way,we are all their cash cows and they will never allow a decrease in their profit margin.

[goblin003]

Anyone starting to have doubts?

You are dreamers and are easily exploited.