Pt 10/10 Republican Presidential Debate 12-12-07

http://researchris.blogspot.com
http://freedomwatchnews.blogspot.com
http://infowars.com

Watch Richard Gage's 2 hour presentation "9/11: Blueprint for Truth". Using the scientific method to show that the 3 WTC towers could NOT have collapsed straight down at near free fall speed because of fires or structural damage. IF YOU ARE A SKEPTIC, THEN THIS VIDEO IS A MUST WATCH.

Click the link below to watch for free:
http://researchris.blogspot.com/2009/07/911-blueprint-for-truth-scientific.html

DOWNLOAD a GREAT business card template for free, promoting http://AE911Truth.org and their mission:

" To research and to disseminate the truth
of the 9/11 collapses of all 3 WTC high-rise buildings
to every architect and engineer. "

TAKE A L@@k AT THIS BUSINESS CARD TEMPLATE HERE:
http://researchris.blogspot.com/2009/07/architects-engineers-for-911-truth.html

DOWNLOAD the file here for FREE:http://www.sendspace.com/file/q4h76n

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• republican
• presidential
• debate
• hunter
• mccain
• ron
• paul
• thompson
• romney
• huckabee
• giuliani
• mitt
• rudy
• cnn
• iowa
• pbs

[cowlen]

WORST MODERATOR EVER

[apriorinfo]

Debate: "a formal contest in which the affirmative and negative sides of a proposition are advocated by opposing speakers".. I've never viewed these as "debates".. but, even more so now cuz they're parroting what Mr. Paul has said all along. Makes ya wonder how long they've held these beliefs!... I agree with the prior poster that there were PERFORMANCES.. as in ACTING. I'd prefer INFORMING rather than PERforming

[keyan99]

hhaha. nice talking to you.

[trapmimble]

You admire Romney for his snake like pandering abilities don't you? I will give him that. He blows Kerry away when it comes to flip flop pandering. Its unfortunate you make such sliminess into a virtue. I suppose if you yourself dream of being a slime ball politician he might be a man to emulate. Its a shame you don't value consistency in philosophy, nor proper grammar.

[keyan99]

any man that isn't too arrogant to believe he has everything figured out. and what you are calling pandering is a reasonable changes in stance. the gun thing specifically, was like i said, a ban on assault rifles and the brady bill; the NRA gave the dude a B.. and which bill's support are you talking about? regardless, a bill before its passed is something totally different then when its put into action, or NOT put into action.

[geneticist1]

lol

[trapmimble]

You missed the point blind follower. Its not a particular stance, its his shape shifting pandering. He supported tough gun laws while running for gov then at the young age of 59 becomes a lifelong NRA member just prior to delivering a speech for Bush. He supported nearly every item in Kennedy/McCain while governor AND NOW?!? He's a slime ball liar. The balance of power relies to a large degree on an honest executive. How many men change their world view in their mid-fifties?!?

[keyan99]

guns? him ever wanting to ban assualt rifles is okay by me. life? i accept it as an evolution of views as has most people. immigration? he's never flopped on immigration.. and what leads you to believe he wants more power in the executive branch than law allows for? line-item veto?

[trapmimble]

Guns, life, immigration and nearly every other position he has held has shifted. You've fallen in love with a flip flopping snake my friend. Even if your with him economically (which I mostly am) the two faced lying and slick pandering should turn you off. Our government is more than a president, there needs to be a balance of power. The last thing we need is a shape shifting snake concentrating more power in the executive branch.

[mjcrawford23]

ok, call me stupid, but I did not get it, what is so funny?

[keyan99]

nice talking to you.

[trapmimble]

Unfortunately, 500 words limit a detailed policy discussion. YouTube comments aren't well suited for that, nor are they well suited for changing minds. Im not that naive. Its entertainment here my friend. I was entertained by your support and eagerness to follow who I believe is the Republican equivalent of John Kerry. In what capacity do you serve or work for Romney's campaign?