CERN "Scientists" proven wrong by an idiot

CERN Scientists were wrong to claim that the LHC may produce "Black Holes".

Lots of evidence of these daft claims online. Here are just a very small few.

The authors of the latest report, including theoretical physicist John Ellis, confirmed that black holes could be made by the collider. But they said: "If microscopic black holes were to be singly produced by colliding the quarks and gluons inside protons, they would also be able to decay into the same types of particles that produced them."
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/7468966.stm

The report added: "The expected lifetime [of a mini-black hole] would be very short."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4327161.stm

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.society.civil-liberty/browse_thread/thread...

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• lhc
• satans
• stargate
• 2008
• large
• hadron
• collider
• nwo
• jesus
• nibiru
• annunaki
• 2012
• freemasons
• illuminatti
• reptilians
• ufo
• ovni

[Baerchenization]

What are your fields of expertise you intend to lecture the LHC scientists on?

[gorilla199]

@Baerchenization

Was the sound off on your speakers or something?

[ExcelsiorFV]

Science is the understanding of nature through logic. Hence why scientists use math to explain scientific phenomena.

You, as a self proclaimed idiot, lack logic. Your brand of logic is to listen to whatever the news says, or you may just base your whole argument off of a simplistic view.

Black holes are objects with immense density- not mass. Smashing heavy metal ions together at near the speed of light causes their masses to compress into an infinitesimally small space.

[MrSmibby]

How would smashing two particles together cause a black hole? Well, a black hole is caused when the mass of an object is compressed into a density called the Swartschild radius, which is the radius of a given mass required to form a black hole. (An object whose gravity is that or greater than the speed of light's escape velocity). I'm not saying that it's impossible or possible for the collider to create such an object, However it would mean particles trillions of times smaller than we know.

[gorilla199]

@MrSmibby

So according to what you cut and pasted and presented as your own thoughts, you are saying that black holes are not reliant on mass

Well that means that the whole black hole theory is rubbish then doesnt it!

[gorilla199]

@ExcelsiorFV

LOL You wally, you actually believe what has not been proven and wave it around like a flag

Print IDIOT on it

And learn to be polite before you forget yourself in public and go home carrying your teeth in your pockets

[Ysbjorn]

@Baerchenization I think commen sens!!!!peace

[tseitz123]

@Baerchenization lol. thats a DAMN good question, isn't it? This dude is such a clown

[ppsp3]

@VanMedia yeah rofl lhc scientists never said that

[ClockNumerology]

@ Black holes are collapsed stars made of 'enormous mass'

Keyword: mass.

Scientists' Brain (is the following)

1: create black hole from nothing

2: when all else falls, use the big bang theory.

LOL

Man is an Idiot; just like Science is an Idiot, too.

PS - Jesus is Lord of Lords : )

[butplug4849]

sfvghmkkmvgdssvghhbvdscvgbhjgf­d7 dghfdvsv6da vnfh vcdghvdhdvhvghbvhjjfhfhthgf

[Tamiara2]

How is it a weapon? You can easily say that scientists are wrong and then afterwards when it is proven that they are go on about how amazing you are. Everyone learns the word 'no' and how to disagree at 2 years old, well done.

[evidenceonlythanx]

Woot woot woot. RELIGIOUS MORON ALERT. Woot woot woot.

[misshotyoga]

I think all of this has to do with opening up gateways, or as the Bible calls them "The gates of hell."