Highest Rated Comments
All Comments (190)
-
i fucking hate theory test so vague its bullshit
not all developing hazards u're given points for
-
i failed this stupid shit by 2 points, FOR FUCK SAKE
-
my theory test is in 1 hour and I'M FUCKING TERRIFIED :(
-
this video just fuckin' didnt help me at all
-
i passed mine years ago, i found it hard to believe how some parts can be a Hazard, so basicly everything that moves is a hazzard WTF, you Drive and it's all a hazard Money for the greedy,
-
this is basically clicking at anything
-
@llloydlot Correct. It is reaction driving. Wait until you murder the cyclist, then click. Don't slow down and anticipate, that would be sensible.
-
@TheEditorsChannel and then you get a message you clicked too many times... yep, been there. It insinuated I was cheating when I was merely reacting to all the cars flying all over the place.
-
@MrMeddled Not to mention, any driver would already slow down for the cyclist, as it is easy to anticipate that he's going to swerve to the right, thus causing the hazard. This test teaches you to react on hazards you're already in, rather than anticipate. In other words, it wants you to wait until you nearly crash into the cyclist, rather than anticipate what's ahead....I agree, the test is a joke.
-
ok im just comfused... u need to click if u see a clue to something happenin then when it changes... its always changing.... so just keep clicking at everthing on the screen....
so pretty much any moving thing is a hazard lol
Hazard Perception is bullshit. Crappy low-res video, crappy software. It is nothing like real driving. No mirrors, you cannot move your vantage point.
Case in point with the pedestrial shown crossing the road, unless you are signalling left and want to turn in there he is not going to be a hazard. If anything he will stop cars pulling out infront of you from the left there.
That car truck is a hazard as well as it might pull out... the whole thing is just a farce. Poor design.