Matrices - Determinants
Loading...
Loading...
2,029
Link to this comment:
Share to:
Uploader Comments (burny1)
see all
All Comments (4)
-
brilliant vedio your method helped me understand determinants of matrices a whole lot easier than the lecture. thanks for posting :-)
-
i go to york too!! i have a test tomorrow and im trying to learn this stuff... this helped out though, thanks
Loading...
- 1:56Video Bloopersby burny1339 views
- 11:02Math Finance- Forward contracts and optionsby burny1454 views
- 9:14Reducing a DFAby burny1506 views
- 8:01Non-deterministic finite state automata from ND...by burny12,669 views
- 2:59Determinant of a 3 x 3 Matrixby acs178972,554 views
- 1:47Inverse of a 2x2 matrixby ljh4761,345 views
- 5:35Diagonalisation of matrix.mp4by S221052,164 views
- 5:14cramer's rule, 3x3 linear systemby robichaudd101,625 views
- 2:47Cramer's Ruleby rebemath8,627 views
- 54:16Mod-2 Lec-3 Determinants Part - 1by nptelhrd4,840 views
- 13:36Inverting Matrices (part 3)by khanacademy101,000 views
- 3:37evaluate 3x3 determinantby robichaudd62,892 views
- 2:45Finding the Determinant of a 4 by 4 Matrixby rxtutor116,373 views
- 7:20Determinantsby waszel2,534 views
- 2:15determinante 3x3by v13dinei43,861 views
- 11:51Introduction to matricesby khanacademy313,026 views
- 2:12Finding Inverse Matrixby ToorakCollegeMaths20,166 views
- 14:14Inverse Matrix (part 1)by khanacademy248,938 views
- 16:55Linear Algebra: Determinant when row is addedby khanacademy6,065 views
- 9:20Matrics Determinantsby simplyLearnt99 views
I didn't know it was necessary to use a matrix of full rank (I'm considering doing some videos of my own like this)... I just though if you use a square matrix without full rank the determinant is 0... but it still HAS a determinant? Did I miss something?
cr1901 2 years ago
@cr1901 Yes thats right determinant will be 0 so in a wierd way it doesnt have one sort of. You are right. :)
burny1 2 years ago