Berea College Turned Upside Down!
Uploader Comments (johnmcglone4)
Top Comments
-
protects us from these homosexuals!!! I am being sexually harassed!!!! ROFLMFAO
-
HAVE YOU EVER BEEN TO BEREA?!?!? We are not sleepy. We went to Occupy Wall street! It was Berea Students who led a march to Occupy Berea when they cut funding to go protest! Berea wants equality and has fought for it since it first started with anti-slavery principles! Berea gives hope to those who can't afford college. Quit stirring up trouble. I hope one day you will feel all the judgment you casted on this college. God must be so proud of you! Get that crown good christian.
All Comments (176)
-
@rirahiji Not just that, I could have a masters and doctoral degrees in several different branches of knowledge.
-
15 Years...You could have had a Bachelor's Degree in Math, Computer Science, and Business, with an Associates Degree in Psychology and half of an Associates in Sociology. That's about three Bachelor's Degrees and 1 1/2 Associates.
-
@kfosbenn Do you think other religions can help them get into the Kingdom of God? When did any of us call anyone 'whores'?
-
@kfosbenn Does Jesus Christ = God?
-
@kfosbenn who says you have had proper training my friend? Who does the Bible say will teach all of us?
No, actually they were doing many things wrong. It is unlawful to try and drown out the message of a speaker in accordance with the following Supreme Court rulings, The size of the community, or its level of tolerance, (cont'd)
johnmcglone4 3 months ago
Sir, these students were doing nothing wrong. They weren't suppressing your speech, they expressing their discontent and protesting your message. Nothing wrong with protesting something you don't agree with. Freedom of speech is not limited to just you and your group. It would be just as unlawful for the police to order them to leave as it would if they told you to leave. Besides, anyone who was just walking by yards away could tell exactly what was going on and what you were there for.
gostars3000 3 months ago
@gostars3000 does not negate the responsibility of government to protect the Constitutional Rights of our members. Consequently, if “citizens must tolerate insulting, and even outrageous speech in order to provide
johnmcglone4 3 months ago
@gostars3000 ‘adequate breathing space’ to the freedoms protected by the “First Amendment”, Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. Falwell, 485 U.S. 46, 56 (1988), and though “the speech in question may have an adverse emotional impact on the audience” (ibid. @ 55), it has been repeatedly mandated by the highest court of the country that “police must permit the speech and control the crowd; there is no heckler’s veto” Hedges v. Wauconda Community Unit School District No. 118
johnmcglone4 3 months ago
@gostars3000 No, actually they were doing many things wrong. It is unlawful to try and drown out the message of a speaker in accordance with the following Supreme Court rulings, The size of the community, or its level of tolerance, (cont'd)
johnmcglone4 3 months ago