Dana Loesch vs. Piers Morgan Debate The Battle Over Guns - 1-28-13

No description available.

• Category

  News & Politics

[estudiantegordo]

The difference is the person's intent with the gun, not just the gun.

[KC Burns]

In that sense one could make a viable argument for the "gov't" never being better armed that it's own citizenry. Or perhaps our government not having the ultimate say or control over our armed forces and law enforcement but rather ensuring that the final arbiter there... is always, unquestionably the people.

In the end, the problem exists not in guns - it exists in the consolidation of power by those in entrenched power. This is why we had a revolution to begin with folks!

[KC Burns]

I'll go one further... I think the founders didn't intend to have a centralized, federal armed force but rather a series of state run militias sustained by funded and well trained armed citizens.

Ensuring that the central governmetn NEVER could exercise power and dominion over it's own citizenry. If we know one thing for a fact is that it was designed very specifically to keep the government subjugate to the people and NOT the other way around.

[thinkrealify]

1:30 I'm not sure the host is right about the 2nd amendment. If I remember right the founding fathers idea of having guns was to allow the people to band together to fight the government if it turned against the people. So really, people in this country are supposed to have machine guns, mortars, cannons rocket launchers, etc. to match the military. If more adults carried weapons then mass murderers would be stopped quicker before doing mass damage.

[zmartinezvega]

Its not that gun owners use arguments like"criminals don't follow the laws" having a firearm for home defense is like being prepared for a hurricane. You hope it doesn't hit your home, but in the event it does, well, you have the provisions and tools to deal with the event. By you argument, imagine if people didn't prepare for said hurricane because the mentality is " well I don't think its going to hit my home" That would be a costly and foolish assumption. Would you gamble your family on it?

[zmartinezvega]

You cannot teach me your language. I already know who to read it and write. As a contractor for the government, I have traveled all Latin America. I don have argument, let me explain to you the reason there are no such things as old laws as you stated. The Constitution guarantees all your rights, like freedom of speech, freedom to defense(bear arms), right of religion. It would be silly that you were granted "guaranteed rights" and some idiot down the road declared the rights to be "too old"Cont

[zmartinezvega]

An attack ,on one of the items in the Constitution sets precedent for an attack on the rest of our rights and it will be done with the pretense to keep us safe. We gun owners have compromised with over 24,000 restrictive laws in the books. De hecho escribiste "you surely had press him" En ingles los botones no son ni femeninos, ni masculinos. Son catalogados como una cosa. Y si tel la das de tan tan educado, por que escribes improperios como "you are all fucked"? Ese es tu argumento? Fallaste.

[juap22]

Yeah button!wow!You can be a teacher someday, idiot!. Ican teach you something also: You can try studying my language and write and speak like i am writing to you in a foreign language, trying to understand this gun problem.Or...dont study a shit and keep mediocre as your stupid comment. Now i see better, if you represent North America as a normal citizen with no argument then i do not wonder why the rest of the world sees you like a fatty ignorant pathetically-patriotic beings with lots of guns

[zmartinezvega]

Why would we need a bottom? Ohhhhh, you meant a button! And you call people stupid?

[juap22]

So guns resolve problems... yeah typically North americans way of thinking. Guys: You are all fucked, keep shooting each other while i keep reading every month of a new shooting case in EEUU, very old laws with very rich people convincing retarded people with the typically phrases like: "is in the constitution", "Guns don't kill people", my god, you have common sense?, you study?, you are well educated?. If you had a bottom to destroy the word you surely had press him. Guns are for terrorist too