National Geographic's American Paranormal: Bigfoot 4 of 5

This documentary was first broadcast on January 24, 2010, on the National Geographic Channel. It was written/produced/directed by Virginian Chris Lofft. The BFRO advised on the production.

The documentary takes a "Legend Meets Science" approach to some of the best evidence, especially the PGF, rather than the typical documentary approach of mere interviews -- believers vs. skeptics.

It presents a mathematically-based argument establishing the validity of the PGF. Most notable, it has the best animated visuals ever made to explain the determinative anatomical issues that bigfoot researchers have been aware of for years.

The approach and results are certainly not novel. In fact they were squarely based on the prior work of Meldrum and Hajicek over the past few years. The involvement of Bill Munns in this doc helped refine the height estimate of the Patterson creature.

The big lady is 7' 6 1/2" tall.

http://www.bfro.net/news/american_paranormal.asp

Founded in 1995 -- The only scientific research organization exploring the bigfoot/sasquatch mystery.
http://www.bfro.net/
Contact the BFRO : CONTACT@BFRO.NET or Phone (408) 634-BFRO [408-634-2376]

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

• American
• Paranormal:
• Bigfoot

[storminator1969]

@burtcane One in BC and one in Manitoba.

[burtcane]

@storminator1969 whoops! sorry i misread you. So your eyes have seen one! U lucky thing. Where were you at the time?

[storminator1969]

@burtcane That is what I mean its not Identified,which means its from a new species,I have seen them I know there out there.

[burtcane]

@storminator1969 How can u compare hair samples to something that has not yet been identified? They need to keep all the hair samples that they cant identify, and compare them to other hair samples that also cannot be identified, then they might start to see a pattern. In the mean time they have estabilished that the hair sample was not anything that is known to exist in that area. That alone is extraordinary evidence. But then theres also the fact it resembles apelike hair. What more do u need?

[storminator1969]

unidentified hair?modern science cant say what it is from?

[skullpheonix6]

I dont get it they have hair but than they say they have nothing to compare it to, if they get more hair theyll stil have nothing to compare it to cause they still have no way to prove what it came from

[lEMGl]

sooo they put a monkey in a ape suit? lol

[jamiemullan]

Why dont they set up a video to see who takes the snare?

[OserSurgeon]

4th

[SWEGTA]

Maybe it's Chuck Norris...