LA Sheriff Backs Down to Full Disclosure

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,869
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 17, 2010

Full Disclosure presents a unique interview with LA Sheriff Spokesman Steve Whitmore who attempts to explain why the Sheriff has suddenly allowed an interview with jailed attorney Richard I. Fine. The Sheriff had denied FDN an on-camera interview for the entire year Mr. Fine has been incarcerated. Did the fact that FDN filed a lawsuit against the Sheriff have anything to do with the sudden access? Watch the video and decide for yourself!

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (55)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • correct me if iam wrong didnt he say. make sure he signs the wavier which i havent seen but iam assuming that the wavier says something about allowing interveiwer to use cameras. tha guy for not being a smart man sure has a good job. all he does is spew b/s and contradict himself

  • He talks about the sheriff and his deputies being "leaders of civil rights" under the constitution? Yet they are holding a man in violation of due process. Absolutely obnoxious behavior.

  • he is full of shit,

  • This is a major case people this exposes real coroption on a level with judges not just in that state and holding people in jail with no charges and it goes against the constitution. Lawsuit scared them and would make waves

  • @rjc071 And it's not like there aren't dozens and dozens of surveillance cameras throughout the facility either so that blows that ruse. What bullshitter. That's how he got the job obviously.

  • @cr8luck I agree. You can always tell when someone is lying because they get way too verbose. The over explain the minutest detail of their bullshit story.

  • You can tell Whitmore is Baca's bootlicker by the way his arms are flailing as he's lying through his teeth. Don't these people know our bullshit detectors on on maximum sensitivity nowadays? You can tell he's lying. His lips are moving.

  • 1. YES 2. NO 3. NO If Richard I. FIne has not been convicted of a crime he needs to be released. City of Bell caught up with corrupt officials why cant we?

  • At some point in a persons life they may become a victim of corruption. If that person is popular, like this attorney, the corruption gets more recognition and could produce enough attention to the public. For others though, not so much. These people have no voice or support. There's corruption at every level, everywhere, and so far I've seen little change from efforts to stop it. There's plenty of talk but I don't ever see people jmaking a difference but expect help when it's their turn.

  • Bull shitting liar that guy is, I'm not from the USA but all this about Richard Fine and the corruption would scare the shit out of me... you need to take your country back and it starts with people like Richard Fine who needs your support,,,, #1 A BIG FAT YES #2 NO, as he says in his own dribble words "he's a nobody" which was the only truth that came out of his gob #3 NO,, i thought the prison officers were there to protect the inmates??? Full-disclosure, keep up the good work...

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more