Part 2 "Sasquatch: Taboo Subject" - Dr. Bindernagel's challenge

"The taboo nature of the subject has really held it back"

Category:

Pets & Animals

Tags:

• Bindernagel
• Sasquatch
• Bigfoot
• garderning
• haunted
• haunting
• horror
• paranormal
• supernatural
• Paranormal
• Activity
• movie
• film
• trailer
• blair
• witch
• project
• thriller
• oren
• peli
• Katie
• Featherston
• Micah
• Sloat
• ghosts
• angels
• demons
• psychic
• movies
• series
• paranormality
• filmartmusicfashion
• metaphysicalics
• catfish

[clewi1091]

I wonder why the guy that shot and killed one didnt try to bring it out of the forest? I can understand him maybe not wanting to talk about it to people for fear of being labeled crazy or something. But to have an actual body of one and not try to get it out doesnt seem right to me for some reason. And the size of it wouldnt matter because he was hunting moose. They are a huge animal also. So I think if he could get a moose out the forest then I think he could have gotten the bf out too.

[trailriderresearch]

@clewi1091 Because it was during WWII and the guy was German, he did not want to draw attention to himself. I did ask john that question after the interview.

[c1zx]

Chest beating? I don't think so, sorry. That is a biased remark because you assume it's an ape. It's a human type, that's why it does 'tree knocking' something you should have known as a researcher which has been repeatedly reported as one of it's behaviors. Sigh, until people drop their biases, there will be no science. THEY ARE NOT GORILLAS OR APES. That is your first bias (mistake).

[trailriderresearch]

@c1zx the important thing about John is he is addressing the issue regarding "acceptance of the evidence" which does constitute discovery. We are all on the same team at this point though yes I agree there are biases and different view points. Let's split hairs after discovery has been acknowledged.

[craig79792000]

He lost me when he said one or two or three hoaxer's. On youtube alone, there are thousands. How can you blame the media for not wanting to look silly again and again. Some good points, but that one does not hold water. Of all the evidence I have seen, I could rationally explain 99% of it as known misidentification. The other 1% keeps me hooked.

[rarebasses]

The one I saw was right IN town, but near a greenway with hugh powerlines and train tracks.

[rmcdaniel423]

There are rumors that there is a human living in the house across the street from me. I've seen some tantalizing bits of anecdotal evidence and heard stories about him from some of the locals who claim to have had sightings, but as of yet, I have never actually seen him. I've certainly never seen any good photos or videos of him. Therefore, I must trust my skepticism and deny his very existence.

[onceANexile]

his last name is a real hinderance, for any serious discussion...

[flycatchful]

Highly informative and to the point. His interview is based on real world knowledge. He makes it plain and simple that this creature is not supernatural but flesh and blood.

[OldJong]

That was really interesting

[CityWideCharlotte]

@c1zx you don't know that for sure. Is it a primitive man? The missing link? A bi-pedal ape-like primate? WTH knows...until someone has a real photo that isn't a hoax of a blurry blob, or until someone produces an actual body...no one will be able to definitively prove this creature's existance must less it's exact placement in the animal kingdom. Heck, I'm still waiting for Melba Ketchum to produce results from the Erickson Project.

[cunnidvd]

@c1zx do you know what an ape is?

[cunnidvd]

great post. thanks.

[cunnidvd]

@c1zx How would you classify them if not ape?