I have no problem with accepting people for who they are. It's being forced to accepting people for who they AREN'T. And I'm sorry, sir or ma'am, but the "wounded puppy" approach won't work here. Really, why can't you accept us for who we are? As males and females, two distinct genders created by a benevolent God. I'm talking about your attempt to distort reality to your own bizarre notions. I'm talking about innocent children who will never know their true parentage because of you.
how is accepting people for who they are a bizarre idea?
I have heard the reasons your side feels the way you do many times before, but the difference is is that being gay is looked at as a bad thing by many people and gay people go through so many struggles and pain that your side doesn't go through at all and yet you say all the horrible things that you do without ever understanding that pain. And that is 1.very intolerent and 2.very bigoted.
You know somethin'? I'd suggest the same thing to you and other gay rights advocates who insist on shoving their bizarre ideas down unwilling throats. Maybe YOU should sit down sometimes and listen to the reasons why some of us are rather concerned about the direction that our society is headed in and please, don't give me any of that stuff about being "intolerant", "bigoted" or any of the other litany of moldy buzzwords that you throw at us.
maybe you would know what the hell you are talking about if you sat down and talked to the people you are against and listen to their stories, and listen to the pain and the struggles that they have gone through because of people like you.
Matt Sanchez, a homosexual with bad spelling. C'mon, there, Matt. Everyone knows Aravosis is a douchebag. But at least he's not a hypocrite AND a doucebag, like you.
Maybe the reason that we take the position that we do is because, to quote you, we do know "what the hell we're talking about". And another thing that really troubles me; just how do you define the word "love"? You characters on the left always are lecturing the rest of us about being more "loving". What do you mean by "love"? Do you mean that anything goes in the name of love? That's what you're suggesting to me. Define that word "love". Please.
Dyke.
loonmaniac 1 year ago
I have no problem with accepting people for who they are. It's being forced to accepting people for who they AREN'T. And I'm sorry, sir or ma'am, but the "wounded puppy" approach won't work here. Really, why can't you accept us for who we are? As males and females, two distinct genders created by a benevolent God. I'm talking about your attempt to distort reality to your own bizarre notions. I'm talking about innocent children who will never know their true parentage because of you.
queenblanche 3 years ago
how is accepting people for who they are a bizarre idea?
I have heard the reasons your side feels the way you do many times before, but the difference is is that being gay is looked at as a bad thing by many people and gay people go through so many struggles and pain that your side doesn't go through at all and yet you say all the horrible things that you do without ever understanding that pain. And that is 1.very intolerent and 2.very bigoted.
gabreeel007 3 years ago
You know somethin'? I'd suggest the same thing to you and other gay rights advocates who insist on shoving their bizarre ideas down unwilling throats. Maybe YOU should sit down sometimes and listen to the reasons why some of us are rather concerned about the direction that our society is headed in and please, don't give me any of that stuff about being "intolerant", "bigoted" or any of the other litany of moldy buzzwords that you throw at us.
queenblanche 3 years ago
I mean love as in caring how other people feel.
maybe you would know what the hell you are talking about if you sat down and talked to the people you are against and listen to their stories, and listen to the pain and the struggles that they have gone through because of people like you.
gabreeel007 3 years ago
It's "D-O-U-C-H-E".
My only hypocrisy is condemning euthanasia when I believe someone like you should have some assistance in killing yourself.
mateo1970 3 years ago
Matt Sanchez, a homosexual with bad spelling. C'mon, there, Matt. Everyone knows Aravosis is a douchebag. But at least he's not a hypocrite AND a doucebag, like you.
Lectronimo 3 years ago
Maybe the reason that we take the position that we do is because, to quote you, we do know "what the hell we're talking about". And another thing that really troubles me; just how do you define the word "love"? You characters on the left always are lecturing the rest of us about being more "loving". What do you mean by "love"? Do you mean that anything goes in the name of love? That's what you're suggesting to me. Define that word "love". Please.
queenblanche 3 years ago
He has an agenda: Gay marriage, trans gender recognition, hate codes etc...
mateo1970 4 years ago
"front man for the gay agenda?"
Wow.
Bigot.
adnogs 4 years ago