Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

A New Argentina - Buenos Aires

A new Argentina & Buenos Aires from the 1981 Tony Awards  
 
Customize

More From: anewargentina

Loading...

QuickList(0)

201 ratings
Sign in to rate
63,105 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (301)   Options

Loading...
spaticus09 (1 week ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
The original London cast owns this musical.
srmtn1 (1 week ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
say what you want, patti lupone is amazing and owns the role, but I was very pleased with madonna's portrayal in the movie version. and the fact she is not a perfect singer adds more authenticity to the performance. i think she (madonna) was amazing and perfectly cast.
lambo11111 (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Well, Che was an argentine I think, but the character may have represented a revolutionaries view of Eva and Juan peron.
Comment(s) marked as spam Show
littlepop24 (1 month ago)
Comment removed by author
powerfulpowerzz (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
i think this was the 1980 telecast, nt 1981
yougottagetagimmick (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
I don't particularly like Madonna either, but Patti also has problems. Not vocally - she can belt like nobody since Minnelli. *grins* But later on, especially in the recent revival of Gypsy, what you said, "assault", is all she did to the tunes. She screamed. 
There's a difference between power and volume. Yes, she can sing, but this is a musical PLAY, and she also needs to act.
VintageBeauty1313 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
the charactor Che Guevara (i know he was a real guy) represents the people of Argentina
Selendomono (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
although wasnt the REAL Che not in argentina at this time....?
VintageBeauty1313 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
no he wasn't, but he was one of the bigger figures of that time. When they wrote this play, they used him to symbolize revolution, which is what he was all about.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.