US Criticizes China on Human Rights

The United States criticized China on Wednesday in its annual report on international human rights. The report was released one week after US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton visited Beijing. During her trip, she said cooperation between the two countries should take precedence over tensions. The report examined more than 190 countries in 2008 and was also critical of civil liberties in Russia.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• state
• department
• report
• torture
• Russia
• criticism
• Hillary
• Clinton
• North
• Korea
• voa
• news
• Block

[CoattailW]

@powerofthroughts continue: i hope china will be democratic as you america in future, we chinese people hope amrican people and all the cilvilized citizens in the world can provide your help one day we need in the persume of democracy!

[CoattailW]

@powerofthroughts you know, as a typical chinese young person, i can really feel much about the dictatorship in china, the communist party want to control all the people in every aspects, take education as an example, all the unniversities in china force the students to learn something that can make us become the slaves of them! or talk about the internet, people even have no rights to surf the twitter,facebook,u2b，and i am using vpn to cross the fucking great fire wall of china.

[powerofthroughts]

The different from China and western human right. Chinese vision of human rights are; the people must have the freedom of success, business, house themselves, have food, look after their family well and keep poverty at bay. Western human right, free speech, you can tell lies, set up hate groups, porno site etc. It is quiet different ideology.I wonder why the west love to defend their western value and the chinese hate it.

[HumanRightsVideosT]

@luc59457

The communist party of china has economic power. If small countries hassle it they will have economic sanctions brought against them.

*

This video shows whats good about freedom of the press. You can criticize your own government without being shot or TORTURED to DEATH, like in China or other totalitarian states.

*

Every country had problems. But totalitarian states have huge problems.

[luc59457]

@FalunGongIsAmazing Well USA have the most of something, that no other country has... Nukes. they are not using them, so they should be useless then right? Especially the amount they have.. Every country can go back and forth retorting others pointing of fingers... The reality is, USA would be able to fix a lot more of its own problems if It didn't deal with other countries so often.. In other words clean up there own act to be better suited to help others, make sense?

[FalunGongIsAmazing]

@luc59457

There are DEATH CAMPS in the PRC. Not many other countries or empires have Death Camps.

[HumanRightsVideosT]

@luc59457

There are DEATH CAMPS in the PRC. Not many other countries or empires have Death Camps.

[luc59457]

@XpresloX I have also seen a video China criticizes USA on Human Rights, so I really don't care about this argument crap they are having. They should just fix it, but they can't and I just explained that. But their is another way, it would take a company like B.P to enact it, and if done right it could potentially profit them billions annually and offer citizens more freedoms in a different system that works to better humanity rather than competition in marketing, we can beat that.

[luc59457]

@XpresloX WE can never really get ahead because the system says we all have to pay for all these (roads, healthcare, education, etc) through taxes, when they are connected to the ones who print the darn bills and the ones who make the rules. Common sense. We can never really get ahead also because of sudden expenses like military operations and bailouts. The ones who make the rules are simple following outdated rules. I don't think its wise for an instant transition, but a slow one, yes.

[luc59457]

@XpresloX Once they invest back into the economy, they need to have enough to progress the infrastructure towards the future, towards something more sustainable. Taking money out of the equation and having fair and regulated neccessities and extras allows more freedom and less room for failure. That also means their would be no cost for education. It is only the system that states the individual must pay for his or her education, through taxes or tuition fees. Even city maintenance,we all pay it