Question NASA 1950

http://www.awe130.com
Question NASA and the film Destination Moon 1950. We would like to point out the remarkeble images of the moon. in 1950 more than 20 years before Apollo 11, more than 8 years before Sputnik1 and 60 years before the whisper. It is time you join the whisper!

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Apollo
• NASA
• AwE130
• moon
• landing
• fake
• or
• real
• hoax
• Apollo Program
• Space
• Earth

[Astrobrant2]

At 1:39, we see four craters in somewhat of a line, just about tangent to the upper rim of the crater. These craters do not appear in more modern photos of Tycho.

At 1:57, we see a crater on the lower right edge of Tycho which is about the same size at the central peak. There is no modern photo showing this crater.

So much for the accuracy of these images.

Apollo ascent and descent films, however, show small details which weren't confirmed until LRO, almost 40 years later.

[awe130]

@Astrobrant2,

The film Destination Moon just shows that in 1950 they already were able to film this remarkable moon shots. We can be sure they are done in a studio, does that mean the moon landing was a hoax? No it does not astrobrant2 but it makes people doubt if NASA could had used the same trickery 20 years later. We just doubt Apollo put a man on the moon.

Peace to you

[mugabesunny]

@Astrobrant2 looks like the excuses are running out astrobrant. nasa hoax is plain to see. so get your hardon in check, there is only so much you can do to believe in your fairytale.

[awe130]

@gijsshu,

e will have our own recorders and film cameras running we will release the debate unaltered we asked a2 to do the same.

peace to you

[ApolloWasReal]

In 1950 there were no satellites and NASA had not been created but we DID have astronomical telescopes. Good ones, too. But when people extrapolated from those telescopic pictures of the moon to the moon close up, they were wrong. And the depiction in a movie like Destination Moon is quite *different* from that in the Apollo pictures.

And the Apollo spacecraft and astronauts looked vastly different from the movie too.

So what's your point?

[gijsshu]

@Astrobrant2 So, if the debate takes place here, not EVERYONE can see what's going on?????. As a nut I can't understand this.

Second: I think you block everyone who doesn't lick your butt. At least it saves you some toiletpaper.

[Astrobrant2]

@gijsshu Because that's where the debate has been taking place. I made the video to answer his challenge to a debate. That's where discussion takes place, so everybody can see what's going on. But as a hoax nut, you *are* prone to shoot your mouth off before you know ANYTHING about a subject.

What people do you think are blocked on my channel?

[gijsshu]

@Astrobrant2 Why on your video? Are you do desperate for views? Why not here? As far as I know AWE doesn't block people with a different opinion, unlike you.

[Astrobrant2]

@awe130 I don't care what we use. Let's discuss details where they belong, on my debate video, where I brought this up on that thread, but you didn't respond. I'll go back and make an announcement.

[awe130]

@Astrobrant2,

We will have no problem with a real time debate astrobrant2. Why would we not use skype? We are willing to workout the details with you.

peace to you