Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Climategate - Chris Horner - Red Hot Lies

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,961
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 27, 2009

Chris Horner exposed the lies behind climate "change" research long before climategate in his book "Red Hot Lies: How Global Warming Alarmists Use Threats, Fraud, and Deception to Keep You Misinformed". This is not the first time pseudoscience has been in bed with "progressive" political ideology. In the last century "progressives" and people calling themselves scientist believed that eliminating various ethnic groups and people with disabilities was scientifically sound policy.
http://biggovernment.com/2009/11/25/climategate-is-not-the-first-time-progres...

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 3 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (skhicks1)

  • Shouldn't there be some acknowledgment that Chris Horner is funded by Exxon-Mobil?

  • Perhaps, but we should also acknowledge that climate science or better yet climate religion is backed by the likes of GE, Al (I invented the internet) Gore and George Soros. They all stand to make a killing with goofy technology such as spraying SO2 in the upper stratosphere in order to cool the earth. And dont forget the UN that is run by third world dictators that want to redistribute our wealth. Only corporate/political criminals and Obamabot zombies believe in man made global warming.

see all

All Comments (15)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The irony that Horner calls others liars, when he is trying to mislead people into thinking that the "decline" was in temperature. The decline was in tree growth not temperature.

    Mr Horner your lies have been exposed.

    There should be a congressional inquiry into Horner's lies. He can't argue with that!

  • @cristop5 Oh for God's sake. Is that the best refutation you can come up with?

  • The scientists in Europe wanted to "manipulate the data" so that the graphs they were working on could be more presentable to one small, particular audience. They were found to not have violated any scientific ethics rules, but they were told to watch how they word their e-mails.

    Besides, this doesn't disprove (man-made) climate change.We're shitting more carbon into the air than we could possible imagine....an we expect their to be no global repercussions?

  • Shouldn't there be some acknowledgment that Dr. Michael Mann and the East Anglia researchers are F-ing LIARS???  Stupid liberals!

  • I keep hearing that man made climate change skeptics are funded by big oil. What about the alarmists? Is there no cash for them? Wasn't COP15 funded by BP?

  • *Is* Horner "funded by Exxon-Mobil"?

    You say he is, but how much money do you claim he's taken from Exxon-Mobil?

    Also, if you believe money corrupts, why wouldn't the billions paid to those pushing the AGW hypothesis have been corrupting?

  • How many third world dictators hold permanent seats in the UN security council? This argument that the third world has any sort of power in the UN is ridiculous.

    Want a real conspiracy? Why did Bush, under the influence of oil lobbyist groups, withhold global warming research from being released? Why was a fraudulent petition with a fake scientific paper released by a well known skeptic group?

  • The cap and trade legislation is designed to dismantle industrialized nations while starving off the 3rd world. If you can't see this is bunk science crafted to produce predetermined desirable result, there is no hope for you.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more