Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Nuclear threats and double standards Pt.3

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
1,570
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jun 19, 2009

More at http://therealnews.com/t/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=102

Zlauvinen: The double standard of Israeli nuclear weaponization and international distrust in Iran

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • So let me get this straight...

    Israel is allow to lie, but no one else is, is that right? That's what I get out of this.

    How retarded do these morons thing we are? Seriously...we just aren't that stupid or naive.

  • Because Israel wants to destroy Iran like they successfully got the US to do to Iraq. That's a nobrainer.

    We all get it, Israel owns the US Government - done. FU Congress and UN, you are all full of shit.

see all

All Comments (24)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • question 1, why would isreal want to get rid of of the very threat of having Nuclear weapons whether they have them or not,which they probalbly do have, a weapon system that has stopped the Arab nations from attacking them AGAIN!! which they have done on 3 seperate occasions,?

    Question 2, If Isreal gave all their Nuclear weapons up in a blase of publicity and then were subsequently attacked by the same Arab states would the UN fight on Isreals behalf to protect a UN ratified independent state?

  • great interview, thx for some real news man.

    AWESOME!!!

  • watch?v=U49fMY3C5tc&feature=ch­annel_page

    That should be it. If it doesn't work, just search:

    "The Influence of the Israel Lobby?N.Chomsky Debates O.Baddar"

    Both men give good info on the issue.

  • The issue is just ... fucked. To nullify the threat of nuclear weapons you can : A) Remove them all from the face of the earth. B) Let everyone have them and hope no one goes crazy.

    Until B is not met, no chance of A ever going to happen. If US destroys it's weapons and a little "rogue" country gets one, they are fucked. So before A can be met, there needs to be a B. But then...how can you logistically remove all nuclear weapons then?

    We are fucked.

  • "Having nuclear weapons is about the surest way a country can keep the US from attacking."

    Than, and McDonalds.

  • US wants (needs) Isreal as a (an other) foothold in Middle-East. Isreal needs (wants?) US for protection, being the only non-muslim country in the Middle-East (and with shaky legitimacy at that).

    Isreal is one of the top countries developping high tech weapons, US is the top buyer of those. So it is also good business (not for the tax payers, of course)

  • link for vid?

  • Ah! OK.

    Thanks dude.

  • They probably haven't posted it yet. When they do multi-segment interviews like this they usually post it over the course of a week or so.

  • Israel the past two years have been really pushing for an attack on Iran and the U.S. won't do it (not because the U.S. is such a good guy but it just is a risky attack that they are not able to pursue at the moment). There are plenty of cases. Noam Chomsky explained it, just search for the YouTube video were he discusses the Israel lobby and how it does NOT boss the U.S. around but that the U.S. is the boss and he gives examples.

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more