YouTube CNN Republican Debate GUN CONTROL

Sherman Rance & Everett Van Der Sloot
Klamath Falls, Oregon

I am an avid hunter and outdoorsman, I would like to know what you are going to do to expand my Second Ammendment rights?

Created by: Ryan Neisz (Burbank, CA) and Christopher Allan Smith (Paradise, CA, onetime of Klamath Falls, OR)

Now that you've witnessed our barking insanity, we invite you to come on over to http://www.Zanzibar19.com to sign up for our newsletter, check out our other episodes, or swear at our mothers in the forums.

If you've truly gone off your meds, feel free to buy your very own SNOWMEN HUNTERS T-Shirt, booze cup (er, uh, coffee cup) or campaign button here: http://www.cafepress.com/zanzibar19/.

If you do, you'll be keeping us off the streets and out of trouble after we get out of school. I think it's obvious by now that we're still trying to finish the 7th grade.

Zanzibar19: A co-production of http://www.RocketSpots.tv and http://www.C2MNow.com

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• YouTube
• CNN
• debates
• repulican
• gun
• control
• second
• ammendment
• sherman
• snowmen
• hunters
• zanzibar19

[DestroyTheseWalls]

First of all.... Fuck you..... Ur quite obviously mocking you're own rights..... But the answer to ur question is in 2012 with the election of chuck norris

[willbond]

Dipshit video. They're trying to convince us that the founding fathers fought a war, with guns, against the British and then wrote it in the Constitution that only a Militia can have guns. Horseshit.

"The right of the PEOPLE to bear arms shall not be abridged". It means exactly what it says.

[rb2112002]

At least it was only 30 seconds wasted.

[CarbineKingClassic]

@chriskieninger

If a citizen owns one. Not a civilian. Civilian is a Nazi word

[CarbineKingClassic]

I love how u dumbasses just do exactly what the establishment wants u to do. U just mock ur own rights. U dumb bastards would run to the gas chambers if u thought it was "trendy" or "progressive." No, not if u thought that. Actual thought is obviously beyond ur cognitive capacity. If u were told it was trendy or progressive. The fact is, the ppl u need to b worrying about r the ones who DON'T want us to hav guns. Because more often than not, the ppl who want to disarm u r gonna kill u

[SuperSneakySniper]

People who don't know crap about guns are more likely to get hurt than ppl who use guns on a regular basis. And we pro-gunners never asked for flamethrowers or tanks, but we would appreciate having our REAL rifles back, please stop issuing bullet buttons and "safe capacity" magazines. Criminals don't use them so why must we? All I really want are our REAL guns back, you know... like the ones the criminals are using on us.

[MetalSights]

Guys, he's not making fun of pro-gun people. Look at his other videos, he uses guns in most of them.

He's making fun of himself, implying he's a crazy gun nut that yearns for more boom.

[KingofComputing]

the funny part is you can already have a flamethrower legally there is no law that regulates the ownership of military surplus flamethrowers

[IshiGoturi]

Not sure if trolling or...

[chriskieninger]

@Brettboat abrams tanks are no more dangerous than a semi truck.......the guns on the the tank , however, are....the batf also regulates ammo for vehicles like tanks , in case a civilian owns one. IF they actually let you own a round for the main gun on a tank, or if you can find one to purchase, they are also taxed INDIVIDUALLY....at like 200 dollars per round.

[Kingofprinces85]

Typical Gun control advocate. They can't beat law abiding gun owning advocates at logic so they then resort to simply making fun of them.