Bob Lazar Excerpts from the government bible PT1

Bob Lazar Excerpts from the government bible PT1

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• Bob
• Lazar

[dumbbell33]

Beamshipcaptain .. mrdrumsauce is a shill and a bad one at that ,no avatar ,no background ,no uploads , the usual shill crap, dont take him seriously ,he is irrelevant.

[UnbreakableMan1988]

Lazar is the real deal

[Beamshipcaptain]

Bob has already been "investigated hardcore" for 21 years. He has also passed 3 independent plygraph tests. His W-2 form for 1989 shows his employer was the Department of Naval Intelligence. The Los Alamos phone registry for 1988-89 shows his name. Mysteriously, all his high-school and college records "disappeared" in 1989, along with his social security number.

[Reticuli]

Otherwise, neither I, nor academia, nor in fact YOU have any reason to think these things are indeed worth claiming.

[Reticuli]

You're thinking about hypothesis. Hypothesis is different than theory/law in science. Free energy. A fixation on Tesla. An unfounded belief that Einstein finished a working version of UFT/GUT. The Philadelphia Experiment. Sorry, I thought I was talking to someone worth having a conversation with. If you or Lazar have better physics models or can show that older ones have already solved the issue of quantum gravity, then write it up with the necessary proofs and submit it to the journals.

[Beamshipcaptain]

@Reticuli THeory and LAW are NOT equvalent terms in science. THeories and laws are indeed broken every day, and the devices in this video break two theories and three laws, and confirm another two theories.

[Beamshipcaptain]

PA LaViolette, PhD, "An Introduction to Subquantum Kinetics:II. An Open Systems Description of Particles and Fields," in "Systems Thinking in Physics," special issue, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENERAL SYSTEMS 11 (1985): 295-328. Rho Sigma (Dr. Rolf Schaffranke) ETHER TECHNOLOGY: A Rational Approach to Gravity Control(1977), PA LaViolette "A Tesla Wave Physics for a Free Energy Universe," PROC. OF THE INTERNATIONAL TESLA SOCIETY SYMPOSIUM, 1991 COLORADO SPRINGS, CO.

[Beamshipcaptain]

@Beamshipcaptain Relativity equates inertial mass and gravitational mass, the two are very separate. Inertial mass can be modified by altering the NET CHARGE of a body. Lightspeed has been surpassed in the laboratory by many times. Obolensky and others show the Magnetic and Gravitational forces are much faster than light, almost instantaneous. FTL Neutrinos have been confirmed in two recent experiments.

[Beamshipcaptain]

@Reticuli Tesla did not "go mad" later in life. Tesla was the inventor, with over 700 fundamental patents, and we still use his radio, television, radar, and polyphase AC current today, 112 years later. Einstein's Unified Field Theory was vindicated by the Department of Naval Intelligence (PROJECT RAINBOW, 1943), the Patents of TT Brown (Electrokinetic Apparatus, No. 2,949,550, August 16, 1960), and the work with flying toroids/coils (Stan Deyo). In fact, the UFT passed muster.

[Reticuli]

@Beamshipcaptain "Theory" and "law" are equivalent terms in science. I don't care what Tesla said about relativity. He went mad later in life. If all we did is listen to him, GPS wouldn't even be possible. And I'm not deifying Einstein, as he never bought into quantum mechanics, which continues to produce actual testable proof of its validity, and not only his GUT attempts above were deadends but parts of special relativity relating to covariance have required modification.

[Beamshipcaptain]

@Reticuli General and special have instead been disproven (relativity is a THEORY not a law) and the Silvertooth-Sagnac interferometry experiments confirm ETHER. Tesla was a strong proponet of ETHER, his inventions we use everyday DEPEND on the presence of Ether. Tesla also did not support relativity. Einstein's Unified Field THeory for Gravitation and Electricity (zur Einheitlichen Feld Therie) in ANNALEN DER PHYSIK, January 10, 1929, is quite correct. Use that as a model instead.

[Reticuli]

@Beamshipcaptain LeSage's theory never even worked for covering everything that Newton did, let alone can it touch Relativity. Dirac did not have a theory of ultramundane corpuscles, though he did theorize about the vacuum being filled with negative energy. Neither is an ether theory, though, but that doesn't matter since General and Special Relativity permanently disproved the ether. A "physicist who doesn't need math" is a liar calling himself a physicist.

[Beamshipcaptain]

@Reticuli The 2 dimensional sheet model is innacurate, because the universe is 4 dimensional. Gravitation is simply due to a converging flux of ETHER. Look at the LeSage and Dirac model of the ultramundane particles. What do you need complicated math proofs for that noone understands anyway?