Proof that Leonardo da Vinci faked the Turin Shroud?

Does The Saviour of the World prove that Leonardo da Vinci faked the Turin Shroud?
British researchers reveal the art history sensation that may end decades of controversy.

Turin Shroud: How Leonardo Da Vinci Fooled History (UK edition)
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Turin-Shroud-Leonardo-Fooled-History/dp/0751538620/re...

Turin Shroud: How Leonardo Da Vinci Fooled History (US edition)
http://www.amazon.com/Turin-Shroud-Vinci-Fooled-History/dp/B0046LUM84/ref=sr_...

Category:

Film & Animation

Tags:

• Leonardo
• da
• Vinci
• Shroud
• of
• Turin
• Saviour
• the
• World
• Salvator
• Mundi
• lost
• painting
• Lynn
• Picknett
• Clive
• Prince

[amstellori]

Verifiable history of Turin Shroud pre-dates Da Vinci by more than 100 years.

In addition the shroud is not a painting or a photograph. A team of scientists who had access to the shroud have not been able to verify how the image was formed even after 30 years of study. They have concluded that it isn't a painting (no pigments dyes or stain) or a photograph. (so Da Vinci is ruled out for starters)

[amstellori]

@felixaliaga Leonardo was from a different period to the shroud. Verifiable history of the shroud pre-dates Leonardo by over 100 years. So any claim that the shroud is the work of Leonardo is plain impossible.

[lasteangel18]

This is so fake please. The documentary stated that there are no dyes nor ink on the Turin so how can it be possible for Leonardo to fake it? I think this is purely nonsense and scientist takes a long time to explain only PARTIALLY the theory and you guys are like (POOF) come out with this nonsense. I think you guys should go read the bible. And for your info, the shroud is not painted nor (no pigments or stains) or a photograph.

[mrsyd01]

Is that it ?? this is your proof ??? HAHAHA !!.... As Mc Enroe would say 'ARE YOU SERIOUS?'.. I mean this is quite pathetic.

Anyone notice the book in the background with the title 'Lucifer'? You arty farty occult freaks have no idea , maybe its you (the guy with the long hair & goaty) thats on the shroud , is that what your going to tell us next ?

Lets put it this way , if were to enter a court room with that evidence as opposed to the evidence for ,you would be destroyed & laughed at .

[GoodShepard007]

If Leonardo Divinchi is responsible for the image this would also make him a brutal and sadistic murderer and photographed his own crime.

And also,

1. Never told anyone

2. Never photographed a sunset or sunrise, or any other person, place or thing.

3. Had access to an atomic laser to encode a 3 D message into the image

4. Was present at the resurrection

5. Wanted people to know Jesus was crucified

6. Wanted people to know he rose from the dead.

7. Has access to a time machine

[BarbarianGods]

The basic ingredients needed to fake the shroud were available at the time of Leonardo, this included the technology to create the negative photographic like image effect that is seen on the cloth. In addition to this there are problems concerning the image itself. For instance the head is disproportionately large compared to the body, and the back of the character in the image is higher than his front. Carbon dating also proves that the cloth dated to around the time of Leonardo and not before.

[jonathandavidblocker]

It's obvious these guys shot themselves in the head with this one. Leonardo drew Salvator Mundi while staring at the Shroud. They forgot about the scourged back, and the pollen from flowers occurring only with a certain radius around Jerusalem.

Guys, "there is no image under the blood stains."

[havocmonger1]

Jesus says to beware of false profits who try to lead you away from the truth. Leo was great, but did he know of the existance of the shroud, and possibly try to debunk it himself? Some people say leo was experimenting with such fabrics and "shrouds", due to his knowledge of "lenses" and microscopes, and possibly could have created a "negetive" image, but to my knowledge none of this has been proven. Jesus, I still believe in you!!

[Mayburyj]

The amazing proof that the Turin shroud and a painting of a face have eyes, nose and mouth in the same places and proportions!

That certainly overthrows all the in depth analysis of the shroud

[davycrocketful]

it makes good drama ..but i dont think so...

[GoodShepard007]

No one disputes Leonardo Divinchi was a great painter, scientist and researcher. But he did not produce the shroud of turin. This is a 8 X 2 Cubit authentic 1st Century burial shroud with human blood on it. That is not art. It depicts a brutal muder with over a hundred wounds inflicted in perfect forensic agreement with a 1st century roman flagrum. A bloody massacre. A crime scene photo, not a science project. The odds this is a forgery is 1 in 282 billion. Better than DNA Evidence.