WTC 7 Foreknowledge

WTC7 was a cantilevered structure built over of a huge ConEd substation. The massive fire left unchecked for 7 hours finally caused the collapse.

You forgot that it was also a state-of-the art structure, was heavily funded, had tight inspections, more than likely heavily redundant, and was not as flimsy as a spaghetti noodle.

Please do not say "massive" fires. There's simply no evidence that they were "massive". Everything points to "small and weak".

heavily funded & state of the art means nothing if a 110 story building falls next to it and massively damages the structure, cuts all water to put out the fires and is left to burn.

it doesn't matter, the massive fire at the substation softened the steel and was the nail in the coffin of that building.

so learn about what happened, quit being an idiot... thanks.

"Now we move to the NY set with Aaron Brown"

at directly to his left

"The Jeruselam set"

I agree with Aaron, we can see the pictures better than he can.

Hey KevinJerck, you didn't say it was "positively" a controlled demolition. And you didn't say it was really really really really really a controlled demolition with sugar and a cherry on top. So I guess you're experiencing some hesitation about it, eh?

I think it would help if you pounded your fist on the table while you're foaming at the mouth. It would add to the drama and effectiveness of your fruitcakery. Just a friendly suggestion.

He said "beyond any reasonable doubt" because he understands that nothing is science is ever unimpeachable, you deluded muffin-cake.

I was having fun with his redundancy and absolutism, you dementia-addled kook!

This was controlled demolition and that's a fact.

People need to understand that above anything else.

This was undeniably, irrefutably, unequivocally, controlled demolition well beyond any reasonable doubt. The evidence is overwhelming to the point that controlled demolition is an absolute certainty.

Once you get that through your head, maybe, just maybe, it will sink in that there needs to be a legitimate investigation.

With the exception of "Tnoy34" who's a total nutcase.

But no other building was left to burn for hours and hours, no other building had such huge structural damage, no other building was built over a massive electrical substation that burned red hot for hours.

You're just poorly educated, that's all.

Many other buildings have burned longer and hotter than WTC7 but did not fail. Please review pictures from the Windsor tower, Mandarin Oriental Hotel and the First Interstate Bank fires and compare to WTC7.

As for WTC7 the NIST NCSTAR 1 report said the damage from the towers debris on WTC7 did not contribute to the collapse.

Hydrocarbon fueled fires dont burn hot enough to melt steel.

Before you call others uneducated you should check some your made up facts. This is too easy.

yes, please name a similar 47 story office buildings full of paper, hit by a 110 story tower, built over a substation that was burning, that had no sprinklers, no fire fighting efforts for 7 hours.

waiting...

if you can't find a similar example it will prove you are a crackpot.