@nico22059 Excuse me, but I was just making a personal comment about it, nothing more. Isn't that why youtube has the "comment" option? I admire her playing as much as you do, so please go away with your smartass comments if you don't have any significant reason for replying.
@celpiano2 more flair? I think if she chose this cadenza it´s for a reason in particular. I bet you can´t write a better or nicer cadenza than this one :P
@celpiano2 maybe you should do the same thing, don´t you think so?
nico22059 11 months ago
@nico22059 Excuse me, but I was just making a personal comment about it, nothing more. Isn't that why youtube has the "comment" option? I admire her playing as much as you do, so please go away with your smartass comments if you don't have any significant reason for replying.
celpiano2 11 months ago
@celpiano2 more flair? I think if she chose this cadenza it´s for a reason in particular. I bet you can´t write a better or nicer cadenza than this one :P
nico22059 11 months ago
The conductor certainly favors a much slower tempo than Maestra Haskil! As always, Ms. Haskil's playing is sublime.
daniel15671 1 year ago
And I'm Rachmaninoff.
celpiano2 2 years ago
I think there was enough flair in the cadenza already. This is Mozart, not Liszt.
jeunehomme9 2 years ago
The Cadenza is good, but there could've been more flair.
celpiano2 2 years ago
I remember in Philips' version she play Beethoven's cadenza, which is different from this one. Maybe this is her own cadenza.
hjchang87 3 years ago
Is this her own cadenza?
murpheeplaysflute 3 years ago
Bravo! It's a pray
mondarron 3 years ago