@klramon That is what Stanley Myers did. His method for hydrolysis used some series of ascending frequencies, and produced far more hydrolysis than anyone else had been able to do. The patent office was highly skeptical; Myers had to bring his whole apparatus to Washington DC to demonstrate it for them there, in their own lab. And he got the patent. He was able to generate H2 and O2 from water, any kind of water. His method was simply very efficient.
@write2topcat Still you have to produce it. There has to be a technology that needs less energy two split water into oxygen and nitrogen. I've heard that there is an algae which splits those two gases via photosyntheses and "eats" carbon dioxide at the same time. Then after they die this biomass can be used to produce biodiesel. These engines which we use today, all (accept the diesel) of them can be powered with hydrogen so only thing we need is the way to separate water more efficient.
@klramon The technology for H2O engines was proven very efficient back in the late 70s to early 80s by Stanley Meyer, but the government grabbed it up and sat on it.
this is a major step forward for engines in generally, this engine offers a lot of power from a smaller engine, and a lower consumption... all I can say is... GOOD JOB guys!
the main problem with running something on hydrogen is that the energy it takes to make pure hydrogen and oxygen is quite high, where are we most likely to get that energy? fossil fuels. so really until we get most of our energy from renewable sources its pointless as the energy has to come from somewhere clean for the system as a whole to be clean. i wont go into energy density regarding hydrogen but that is also a problem... i agree though GM isnt a car company for this century.
They work also on hydrogen engines but now it doesn´t worth it. To separate hydrogen and oxygen you need more energy then you get as fuse them. So it first we need a technology to make the production more efficent. We have engines which can run on hydrogen but there is no fuel. I think there is an alterntive way. Algea!
Why dont u just work on the H20 hydrogen engine so we dont
have buy more gas or diesel.I love diesel benz but i would love to have a HYDROGEN CAR.Here in the USA we are happy with 35-45/mpg but in Europe 70-80/mpg.RIP General
@klramon That is what Stanley Myers did. His method for hydrolysis used some series of ascending frequencies, and produced far more hydrolysis than anyone else had been able to do. The patent office was highly skeptical; Myers had to bring his whole apparatus to Washington DC to demonstrate it for them there, in their own lab. And he got the patent. He was able to generate H2 and O2 from water, any kind of water. His method was simply very efficient.
write2topcat 9 months ago
@write2topcat Still you have to produce it. There has to be a technology that needs less energy two split water into oxygen and nitrogen. I've heard that there is an algae which splits those two gases via photosyntheses and "eats" carbon dioxide at the same time. Then after they die this biomass can be used to produce biodiesel. These engines which we use today, all (accept the diesel) of them can be powered with hydrogen so only thing we need is the way to separate water more efficient.
klramon 9 months ago
@klramon The technology for H2O engines was proven very efficient back in the late 70s to early 80s by Stanley Meyer, but the government grabbed it up and sat on it.
write2topcat 9 months ago
this is a major step forward for engines in generally, this engine offers a lot of power from a smaller engine, and a lower consumption... all I can say is... GOOD JOB guys!
demin2609 1 year ago
the main problem with running something on hydrogen is that the energy it takes to make pure hydrogen and oxygen is quite high, where are we most likely to get that energy? fossil fuels. so really until we get most of our energy from renewable sources its pointless as the energy has to come from somewhere clean for the system as a whole to be clean. i wont go into energy density regarding hydrogen but that is also a problem... i agree though GM isnt a car company for this century.
metfan89 1 year ago
also include Fprd!
AdMiRaLeDpIeTt 2 years ago
its all about efficiency then we will progress into electric cars
dnlx5 2 years ago
They work also on hydrogen engines but now it doesn´t worth it. To separate hydrogen and oxygen you need more energy then you get as fuse them. So it first we need a technology to make the production more efficent. We have engines which can run on hydrogen but there is no fuel. I think there is an alterntive way. Algea!
klramon 2 years ago
Why dont u just work on the H20 hydrogen engine so we dont
have buy more gas or diesel.I love diesel benz but i would love to have a HYDROGEN CAR.Here in the USA we are happy with 35-45/mpg but in Europe 70-80/mpg.RIP General
Motors and Chrysler!!!!!!
aldottzoltan 2 years ago