VANQUISH Demo: 360 vs. PS3 build

Digital Foundry pits the 360 and PS3 demo of VANQUISH against each other.

Category:

Gaming

Tags:

• VANQUISH
• SEGA
• PS3
• Playstation 3
• Xbox 360
• 360
• Demo
• 360 vs. PS3
• Digital Foundry

[Five500Hundred]

360p...the quality is so bad you can't tell the difference.

[SEGAbits]

@Five500Hundred Yes, I got the video off of Eurogamer site. Its a bit better there. Will try to get it in HD and re-upload.

[sinnnerfree6666]

Looks the same on both. Has more stable framerates on 360.

[basajaun87]

ps3 win

[lobtroter]

look so better on ps3

[Mezzergb]

After the shocking port of Bayonetta to the PS3,good to see the PS3 got the edge this time. Fair play to the team for taking the time and making the effort.360 has always been lead platform for multi platform games.It would cost to much and kill the time span if cross platform games were made ground up on both.PS3 has in the past got shoddy ports,although its been much better the last year or so,with the PS3 exclusive for the most part showing qualities way beyond the 360.It needed to change..

[WizardOfWor]

@DialgaMarine3: If I was going to spend money on a home gaming console, I would NOT spend more than $400 bucks on it. That's my limit. If anything, I would wait for the price to come down. Only diehards would consider spending $500-$600 on a gaming console. That's like your rent money right there.

[WizardOfWor]

@DialgaMarine3: Sega may have "started" online gaming on consoles, but MS did it better. Plus you are such a fanboy for saying that the 360 is not a real next gen console. If anything, it's the Wii that's not a real next gen console. Plus only a moron would shell out $600 for a home gaming console.

Plus the Xbox wasn't THAT expensive, as it was at the same price as the PS2 at launch. And seriously, STOP trying to look for an argument, because I know what you're trying to do.

[DialgaMarine3]

@WizardOfWor Oh and theres a flaw to that XBL comment. XBL was not the first online service in a console. It was actually Seganet on the Dreamcast, so what you meant to say is that neither XBL nor PSN would have existed without Seganet. Thats not true however. Online play in gaming has existed for a long time, and it was known years ahead of time that Sony and MS would be implementing it sooner or later.

One more thing: The original Xbox was more expensive than the PS2. Care to comment?

[DialgaMarine3]

@WizardOfWor So...... Youre telling me that you dont mind spending money on a console that gives you little to nothing for your money, unless youre willing to spend hundreds more on accessories. But a console that brings you all that the other console doesnt give you, for a couple hundred dollars more without the accessories and some extra is bad to you? Sony wanted to create a real next-gen console, not simply recycle the last gen but give it prettier graphics.

[WizardOfWor]

@DialgaMarine3: The question is, did anyone give a crap about Blu-Ray back then? No. You can have a lot of things inside a system all you want, but the number one thing which helps certain console or handheld succeed is the price tag. $600 was too much for a gaming console.

Plus without Xbox Live, PSN just wouldn't exist. Sony, like Microsoft, are good companies, but stop trying to make Sony look like a saint, because they used to overcharge people for accessories back in the PS1 & PS2 days.

[DialgaMarine3]

@WizardOfWor Exactly my point. Sony offered a Next-gen system that was the most advanced console ever seen. It gave gamers everything they needed, which for the 360, you had to spend hundreds of extra dollars on accessories to get the same quality. Not only did the PS3 come with alot more in one console, it also offered free online and didnt break down after a week.

So, no shit the PS3 was more expensive. It was a new console that brought alot to the table.