David Ray Griffin - Too Scared To Face His Critics

Hardfire's Ron Wieck explains why David Ray Griffin, a leading figure in the 9/11 "truth" movement, refuses to appear on Hardfire.

Griffin is a retired professor of theology & religious philosophy, so why the hell he thinks he's qualified to write books on conspiracy theories & matters of structural integrity beggars belief.

Still, the retarded "truthers" love anyone who helps promote their agenda of lies, so they buy this charlatans books and make this fraud a rich man!

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• 9/11
• truth
• movement
• griffin
• ron
• wieck
• truthers
• alex
• jones
• richard
• gage
• loose
• change
• avery
• bermas

[millvalleyrn]

WTC 7 IS the smoking gun. There is a reason that a staggering number of people have never even heard of Building 7.

I see lots of slanderous name-calling referring to DRG in this video without EVIDENCE -- if you're going to call him a liar and a coward, can't you even explain WHY in very specific terms? NO, you can't.

[terrymanning1]

@millvalleyrn WTC7 fell down because of structural damage and fire as has been proven by NIST. Griffin isn't even an engineer so what the hell does he know? Bottom line is that Griffin is LYING about WTC7. LYING about a plane not hitting the Pentagon. LYING about his true motives for lying about 9/11 (he;s a pacifist and wants to see Bush in the dock for war crimes) and too SCARED to take on his critics in a live TV debate. There's your EVIDENCE now piss off.

[mikeyt34]

Grifin is obviously mentally ill, and his flock sure ain't far behind.

[terrymanning1]

@mikeyt34 I disagree. He's a cynical liar trying to cash in on his lies. The people who buy his crap are the retards.

[waitew]

I'll make a some claims & I challenge anyone to debunk.The Pentagon was struck farthest from the military leadership (NMCC,SecDef),The area hit (wedge 1) was mostly empty (about 1/6 capacity,was the only 1 with specially reinforced walls (with Steel & Kevlar) designed to resist bomb blasts,absorb energy & contain debris,was the only 1 with full sprinkler coverage & was struck perfectly to minimize penetration (only 3 of 5 rings) & contain the debris withing the building.Now debunk those.

[AceofDlamonds]

God.....turthers lie.

[DeerStop69]

@millvalleyrn There is a reason.... staggering number.... I don't know - sounded suggestive to me. Either way, even if some people who were of adult age at the time, did not (for some strange reasons) hear about WTC7, it changes nothing about what happened to the building - so I don't know then, what the point of your comment was? There was ample coverage on the day, about it falling. I remember seeing talk about that on multiple channels, for hours, on the day (and after).

[millvalleyrn]

@DeerStop69 I did not suggest a coverup at all, more like lack of coverage - or people simply forgot about it in their shock over the events of the day.  Apparently there are many people who are not aware of the events around WTC7. I didn't add the ominous music, you did. No drama from me.

[DeerStop69]

@millvalleyrn " There is a reason that a staggering number of people have never even heard of Building 7." (Cue ominous music.. ) Yes, it's called ignorance. Do you have any idea how silly you sound? All who paid attention on the day, and in the aftermath, were fully informed that WTC7 fell. Are you actually trying to suggest that it has been covered up in the aftermath? How ridiculous an argument is that? It's beyond me how it could be possible to say something like that, with a straight face..