WWE returned to Montreal, Quebec and the Bell Centre previously known as Molson Centre. A new concept of submissions was presented. How did it go in my eyes?
I would have to press you to become more objective on the subject. Though I respect your comment and understand what you mean you are still very subjective here. Good and bad wrestling are very relative terms. According to kids nothing is bad about wrestling today. According to SOME older nothing is good. According to others some are good some are good. According to old wrestlers and fans, NOTHING has been good for 20 years. So we dont have good or bad, all we have are different opinions.
well a review, per definition, is an evaluation containing of a critical statement, opinions along with a possible grade or rating. A review can be brief, shallow, general, in-depth etc, a there is no definition for a review time-wise due to all these parametres. A review hence can be all from 30 secs to several hours long. Or if in written form, all from a few words to hundreds of pages.
I honestly didn't see that coming, I figured Taker would win his return match, but business wise that was brilliant. This will make Hell in a Cell more interesting.
Yeah i was glad that Punk kept the title,he would have looked weak if he lost it so fast and there tryna make him a major heel so that wouldnt have worked,and yeah im sure Taker has used the submission after it was "banned",i think Taker Vs Punk HIAC would be real good though
Did you see that Rany Orton too was screwed in a way.The I quit sound came even before he said which means the sound was recorded one.
20033716 2 years ago
okay :)
AlundraBlayzeFan26 2 years ago
I would have to press you to become more objective on the subject. Though I respect your comment and understand what you mean you are still very subjective here. Good and bad wrestling are very relative terms. According to kids nothing is bad about wrestling today. According to SOME older nothing is good. According to others some are good some are good. According to old wrestlers and fans, NOTHING has been good for 20 years. So we dont have good or bad, all we have are different opinions.
SpeakingOfWrestling 2 years ago
Noone has claimed Legacy needs to make history.
SpeakingOfWrestling 2 years ago
Yeah?
well a review, per definition, is an evaluation containing of a critical statement, opinions along with a possible grade or rating. A review can be brief, shallow, general, in-depth etc, a there is no definition for a review time-wise due to all these parametres. A review hence can be all from 30 secs to several hours long. Or if in written form, all from a few words to hundreds of pages.
SpeakingOfWrestling 2 years ago
The whole idea of a screwjob is pretty good for the storyline between Taker and Punk. It makes things alot more interesting now.
DevinHades 2 years ago
I honestly didn't see that coming, I figured Taker would win his return match, but business wise that was brilliant. This will make Hell in a Cell more interesting.
Trojan761 2 years ago
Yeah i was glad that Punk kept the title,he would have looked weak if he lost it so fast and there tryna make him a major heel so that wouldnt have worked,and yeah im sure Taker has used the submission after it was "banned",i think Taker Vs Punk HIAC would be real good though
FitzyFitzMusic 2 years ago