Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

WTC 7: The Smoking Gun of 9/11

WTC 7 collapsed in 6.5 seconds at 5:20pm on 9/11. Multiple emergency workers reported a countdown over the radios immediately preceding the collapse. Witnesses to the collapse heard numerous explos...  
 
Customize

More From: IraPopuli

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
459 ratings
Sign in to rate
100,977 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Download This Song:
Advertisement

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (931)   Options

Loading...
zeuqzavaj (2 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
seven billion reasons to blow it up. three thousand why they will pay. no statue of limitations on murder
shivkite770 (3 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
why would they blow up WTC 7 when they knew people were still inside? and why would they blow it up in the first place?
ViperXXXXXXX (3 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Well no one was still inside WTC #7, and it contained a lot of inportant documentation.
ViperXXXXXXX (3 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Are you even reading what I'm writing? lol. Do some research into what I say, I'm not making shit up. Or you can just ignore it, do the same thing NIST is doing.
MrYahoost (3 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Are you reading what I'm writing? That's more to the point, are you readin what I'm writing? Revise it? You mean the way Scholars for 9/11 Truth constantly revise their site? The way Loose Change has 3 versions, all recut and re-edited? Or are those revisions different. When you find new things you revise old copies. This proves they WERE looking for answers, thats how they kept finding new answers. Otherwise they would have had 1 report, sent it out and forgat about it.
ViperXXXXXXX (3 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
I'm reading what you're writing, and none of it seems to follow up on what they're ignoring. The head of NIST said molten metal was impossible, he offered his e-mail address to the person who told him about it, so he could refer NIST to the documentation containing what NASA discovered. When asked for the e-mail address, he refused to hand it over.
ViperXXXXXXX (3 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
So given that... No, they're not trying to find the truth, they're trying make ways this is possible, by LYING, and IGNORING the truth. They LIED about the speed that WTC#7 fell. This is confirmed FACT. So stop saying they figured out what happened because that's not true.
ViperXXXXXXX (3 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
They COULD NOT explain the collapse of WTC#7 without increasing the actual fall time by two seconds. They CANNOT and ARE NOT WILLING TO explain molten metal.
ViperXXXXXXX (3 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Watch Zero, a 9/11 investigation, it has 10 parts 10 mins each, then watch a debunking video, do some research. You seem intelligent, if you still think it wasn't an inside job you'll have a whole lot more to argue.
MrYahoost (3 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
ok man I'll give it a look.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.