Richard Gage 9/11 - Explosive Contradictions!

RICHARD GAGE EMBARRASSING HIMSELF.

I want to edit a better version of this but am uploading it as is for now.

This is few clips from a debate Richard Gage had with explosive expert Ron Craig.

My video here involves 3 occasions that are presented IN ORDER where Gage wildly contradicts himself. I then go back and forth between them to show even more how contradictory he is if it wasnt already so obvious.

So first you hear him say they would have used thermite so its quiet as you wouldn't want to have big explosion sounds giving away your demolition, then he later says that these explosions were so intense it hurled steel beams around, then later goes back to the first point.

FULL AUDIO HERE:
http://stoplying.ca/video/richard_gage_debate.htm
(a truther website hosting this embarrassment is quite funny)

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Richard
• Gage
• Ron
• Craig
• debate
• contradiction
• explosives
• explosions
• sounds
• 911
• truth
• Explosive
• Contradictions
• Zeitgeist
• the
• movie
• WTC7
• building
• NIST
• PART
• Video
• of
• Critical
• Analysis
• part
• video
• truther
• debunked
• debunk
• refuted
• wtc7
• world
• trade
• centre
• conspiracy
• theory
• theories
• david
• ray
• griffin
• peter
• joseph
• alex
• jones
• conspiracies
• JREF
• Mark
• Roberts
• nwo
• new
• order
• criticisms
• ae911
• ae911truth
• architects
• and
• engineers
• embarrassing
• thermite
• nano-thermite
• nano
• Moving
• Forward

[TheSkepticalIdealist]

@anthonyc31 @anthonyc31

-

See what I mean...The hijackers are not still alive and you have zero evidence that they are. If you actually look up who these "alive" hijackers are meant to be, they have different names, different bithdates, different families and they look different. Nearly a decade old retracted BBC news article is all you have. Why isnt the "you're crazy" angle going to "work" for me? Everyone thinks you're crazy even the majority of the truth movement which are fringe as it is.

[anthonyc31]

@TheSkepticalIdealist i'm not sure the "crazy" angle is ultimately gonna hold up for you. As for the "truthers", i hope they get just as angry at fuckballs like you and the bigger fuckballs that continue to push the BS of "planes" hitting the towers. The fact that the alleged hijackers are still alive and well should have been a BIG fucking clue but some people are just dense. Watch the Dimitri Khalezov documentary interview and learn what happened on 9/11.

[TheSkepticalIdealist]

@anthonyc31

-

Curious onlookers? Anyone that takes digital planes any nuclear bombs on 911 seriously is not someone capable of coherent logical thought processes. That's why only a fringe minority  of your fellow conspiracy theorists actually take you seriously, and truthers are a fringe minority to start with. I don't need to discredit you, because there are truthers extremely pissed off that you guys are making them look bad

[anthonyc31]

@TheSkepticalIdealist wait wait wait ... you forgot to include ridicule in your posts ... you posted the standard "crazy" comments just fine but you really need to add more ridicule to your posts otherwise your lame-ass attempt to discredit really lack the bite needed to ward off the curious onlookers, which is ultimately what you're gunning for. But go ahead, i'll let you course correct :)

[TheSkepticalIdealist]

@anthonyc31

-

So why do you think that no one takes your crazy tale seriously and even most other truthers think you're nuts? That must suck to be you.

[anthonyc31]

@TheSkepticalIdealist i don't give a flying fuck what you or what you think "fellow truthers" think about me ... the truth is available to to those that are looking for it. You, on the other hand, are free to continue believing the various bullshit stories floating around, including the biggest bullshit story of all called the 9/11 Commission Report. No planes hit the towers. 3 underground nuclear detonations took down WTC 1,2 and 7, and a missile hit the Pentagon.

[TheSkepticalIdealist]

@anthonyc31

-

Digital planes, nukes. Wow. Amazing how not even your fellow truthers take you seriously.

[anthonyc31]

The only explosions that went off, were exactly where the digital "planes" hit. That's it. The WTC was a controlled underground nuclear demolition. 80% of the towers were turned to dust. That explains all the controversy with "planes" (no actual evidence) and all the confusion with how could 2 towers be entirely wired (they weren't). Watch Dimitri Khalezov's documentary interview / testimony to learn the truth. Need more? Radiation-related sicknesses are affecting the 9/11 Rescue Workers.

[TheSkepticalIdealist]

@anastasia2657 - ...continued...- - "you can hear many explosions (explosions sounding exactly like controlled demolition" - Lies. there is no video showing any explosions that sound like controlled demolition. Which btw no controlled demolition in the world is even trying to be anywhere near powerful enough to fling heavy steel h - " people testifying about explosions," - Explosions in fires are common, is that difficult for you to understand?

[TheSkepticalIdealist]

@anastasia2657 - ...continued...- - "you can hear many explosions (explosions sounding exactly like controlled demolition" - Lies. there is no video showing any explosions that sound like controlled demolition. Which btw no controlled demolition in the world is even trying to be anywhere near powerful enough to fling heavy steel h - " people testifying about explosions," - Explosions in fires are common, is that difficult for you to understand?