Upload

Loading icon Loading...

This video is unavailable.

California Redevelopment Agency Update: The Implications of the Matosantos Decision

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like Allen Matkins's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike Allen Matkins's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add Allen Matkins's video to your playlist.

Uploaded on Feb 23, 2012

www.allenmatkins.com
In California Redevelopment Association v. Matosantos, the California Supreme Court put an end to redevelopment agencies. In 2011, the legislature adopted AB26, which put a "freeze" on redevelopment agencies and put in place a process for their dissolution. It also adopted AB27 which allowed the agencies to continue to exist as long as they allocated their funds to other agencies. The issue before the California Supreme Court in the Matosantos case was the constitutionality of both AB26 and AB27. The court found AB26 to be constitutional and AB27 to be unconstitutional. Now redevelopment agencies are being dissolved and developers must deal with the successor agencies. This video describes the steps developers should take.

  • Category

  • License

    Standard YouTube License

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

The interactive transcript could not be loaded.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading...
Working...
to add this to Watch Later

Add to