2003 Yamaha Blaster and 2004 Kawasaki KFX700 race
Uploader Comments (IOwn4Tractors)
Top Comments
-
@IOwn4Tractors the blaster will defintly beat the kawasaki their pieces of shit.
GO 2 STROKES and YAMAHA
-
your fuckin high i have a blaster 260 displacement and that thing could smoke a 400 ex you just gotta know how to drive a 6 speed
All Comments (164)
-
2 stoke do not suck! theres a engine differnce a blaster is super fast off the start! a kfx 700 is pretty fast off the start butt has way more speed in a distance race.
-
200 vs 700 not suprised by the outcome even though the blaster is a two stroke. The blaster def sounds better though...
-
i love my blaster i want to jet it out .......
-
Haha!kfx700 best
-
How do they suck it's a 200cc and keeping up
-
How do they suck it's a 200cc and keeping up
-
@IOwn4Tractors oh yeah, 2 strokes suck alright. lol some people need to shut up =) i used to have a 250 trail boss with a blown oil injector, and it could smoke a 300ex & keep up with a 400ex. 2 stroke torque is a force to be reckoned with when you know what to do with it
next time you wana drag race, make sure there maby even close to the same class
majicalsocks21 1 month ago
@majicalsocks21 stock for stock they were close, about 3 quad lengths difference
IOwn4Tractors 1 month ago
2 strokes suck. Theres a reason why there in weed wackers
cubcadetboy1962 3 months ago
@cubcadetboy1962 because they're small and powerful? yeaa no, they dont suck
IOwn4Tractors 3 months ago 3