catholic blasphemy

catholic blasphemy

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• catholics
• pope
• bishops
• fathers

[MysticalCity]

@stub112 Jesus clearly started the Catholic Church upon Saint Peter, thats why he changed his name, from Simon to Peter, anytime God changes someones name in the Bible it symbolizes leadership, Saint Peter was the first Pope, he died in Rome, which is why The Vatican is there, Every Saint was a Catholic no other Church can claim that, every other denomination started after the 16th century, although the orthodox group split in 1054.

[okarab]

this video contradicts itself....by interpreting the bible ...and using numerology.....a book created by men, compiled and edited by men, translated into latin, english...ect., and used by men to dominate other men for wealth and power.

[stub112]

@CartmanMorisato tell it like it is brother

[xebec1958]

@CartmanMorisato Jesus didn't start the catholic church.

[CartmanMorisato]

#4: The Pope and priests do not forgive sins, God does THROUGH them through APOSTOLIC SUCCESSION, given to the one Catholic Church by Christ himself through the Apostles. The founding of the Catholic Church can be traced back historically to Christ himself. And your churches can be traced back to whom? A man with his own misinterpretations of Holy Scripture no less.

[CartmanMorisato]

#4: Again, cleverly taken out of context just like this whole false interpretation of the Book of Revelations. I'm not surprised. In definition 1 the narrator sides with the Jews, who have not have all of Scripture yet revealed to them by God, rather than with Jesus Christ himself, who is both fully God and fully Man. How can someone claim to have faith in the Lord Jesus Christ yet misinterpret Scripture just as the Jews did, who were blinded by their own false righteousness??? Its oxymoronic.

[CartmanMorisato]

#3: Yeah lets add up words to make our own numbers. You might as well see letters between the figures of Jesus and the Apostles in paintings when they aren't really there...oh wait, Dan Brown beat you to it. Interestingly enough he also pretended that the Apostle John in the painting was a woman rather than what it really is supposed to be...kind of like he misinterpreted something. Now where have I seen that before?

[CartmanMorisato]

Prophecy #1: Who just defined the woman and dragon as church and nation? The interpretation of the person who made that video, not any one Canon. #2: First the narrator assumes that the woman is a church and the beast is a country, now he assumes the mountain is a hill because of "Strong's Concordance" ...which is what? Someone else's interpretation again?

[CartmanMorisato]

If the Bible defines itself how does one know they are correctly interpreting the Bible without any form of instruction?? Wouldn't there need to be a sole interpretation of the Bible rather than many?